posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 05:00 PM
I thought I did debate this by pointing out that you can randomly deduce anything such as this from any movie.
See, the flaw in all of this is the "when".
This move was released in December 2001, which is 3 months AFTER 9/11.
In order for the film to give clues (warning) about 9/11, they woulda released it prior to, not after the fact. If it infact was about 9/11.
But even in the original post, the thread starter seems to have uncertainties as to "when".
If they were ment to be real clues, you'd be able to figure out the when to specifics, just as you did with the who, where and what.
I believe the next attack will be with suitcase nukes against an Eastern City or populated area near an Eastern coastal military
Notice the missing part? I did, you forgot the "when".
The problem with not naming a "when" is that you can't be proven wrong. So seeing how it's impossible for me to prove you wrong, and dispute your
claims, I'll do my best to point out the flaws, and hopefully raise doubt in your claims.
Or, you can simply name "when", and when nothing happens, ABM can go back to being just a movie.