Clues to the next terrorist attack in "A Beautiful Mind"

page: 1
1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 10:34 AM
link   
I know that this will sound convoluted at first, but hear me out...

First, if you think 911 was carried out by Osama bin Laden because he hates the West, do not bother to read on, this thread is definitely not for you.

If you believe, as I do, that 911 was carried out with the full complicity (and perhaps coordination) of Satanic elements within our own government, read on:

I believe the criminal mattoids who pull off stunts like this sometimes like to wax dramatic in their smugness and disdain for the intelligence of we,"the ignorant masses."
I believe they plan fantastic elements into their scenarios on occassion (like this incredible story about Mohammed Atta's passport breaking through the aircraft, avoiding fires hot enough to "melt" 4'x4'steel girders, and landing on top of the rubble at ground zero to be found by a "rescue worker") so that they can laugh at us and talk amongst themselves about how "they'll believe anything we tell them."

When I watched "A Beautiful Mind" with Russell Crowe, the first time...certain things seemed very odd to me. I watched a few more times, and now I believe that the possibility exists that this film contains code as to when the next terrorist attacks will occur. (Sort of like mass murderers planting clues so that they can be caught--and make no mistake about it, these mattoids are indeed mass murderers on a massive scale.)

This is ONLY a possibility, but I have decided to post it here so that it is at least on the record in a public domain such as this website.

John Forbes Nash was indeed a brilliant man. He worked for the Rand Corporation (a well-known, pro-world government, Trilateral Commission-linked think tank) in the 50s, not the "Wheeler Labs" mentioned in the film. He is diagnosed at the age of 30 (very, very late...most schizophrenics are diagnosed in their teens--even back then) only AFTER he decides that Senator Joe McCarthy was indeed right about the Communist infiltration of high positions within the American State Department, the military, the FILM-MAKING industry, etc., and, only after he begins working to expose more Communist agents and plans. (McCarthy has since been proven right by the sworn statements, published works, of many Soviet defectors, and some honest academics.)

When I saw that George Will (Trilateral Commission) was on the jacket (of the DVD I bought) as the movie critic, instead of Siskel & Hebert, or some other real movie critic, calling the movie "a beautiful mystery," I began to dig deeper. (Also note that the extras to the DVD also contain an endorsement by recently-whacked Senator Paul Wellstone, and Ron Howard's quote:"We are presenting a real world" with this film, with the word "real" underlined.)

Russell Crowe (as Nash) "imagines" suitcase nukes, test tube babies, super computers, implnatable microchips, etc...all in the 1950s, decades before these technologies become available. The funny thing about that portryal is that schizo don't create alternative realities, they merely reflect existing ones. This is when I felt something was indeed very strange in this film.

Crowe/Nash is told by his OSS/CIA handler to decode information in popular magazines pertaining to Russian codes for routing instructions on the pre-positioning of nuclear devices on US soil. Plenty was also planted in this way about 911, in Times, Newsweek, People Magazine, etc...all of which I have documented in my videos on 911. George Bush described Al Q'eda as doing this (but within their Al Jazeera-released videos) in the days after 911.

Nash has several epiphanies during the film when information he is looking at is magnified and highlighted and cimetagraphically lifted off the page in brilliant light for us to see. My theory is that these epiphanies may contain information on the next attack.

The first epiphany of this type is clearly that of an explosion (go back an review the film.) This is the "what."

The next epiphany is of a group of inter-connected pyramids (The Illuminati as displayed throughout corporate symbols all over the western world.) That is the "who."

The third epiphany is of an hour class with certain letters and numbers lifting off the page of one of Crowe's magazines. Within this hourglass we have the number 11 in a high central location within the hourglass (twin towers, but also perhaps for November) the word "Cole" below--as in the USS Cole?? the word "four"--as in the year 2004? the word "two" as in the date 11/"2"?, and the numbers "2" & "3"
as in between 2:00 and 3:00?? or at 23:00?? This is the "when."

The fourth epiphany is a smiliar lifting off the page from a magazine and this time it is in the shape of a pair of glasses (as in where to look?) The highlighted words (and I went back to inculde a brief two word epiphany a few minutes earlier in the film with this one) are: "U.S. Ancient Army port Site. British on on." Could this be West Point?? This is the clue for the "where."

I believe the next attack will be with suitcase nukes against an Eastern City or populated area near an Eastern coastal military installation.

All pure speculation, I admit. But at least now it is out there. Maybe if others look at the movie again with this critical eye, they will see things that I missed, or come up with other interpretations that work better. If so, please post you info here.

Thanks for you interest.




posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 11:01 AM
link   
didn't see the movie, so I can't really agree or disagree with you, I'll have to watch it now, just because you brought this up.



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 11:09 AM
link   
Good. Be sure to post back here after you've seen it, O.K.?

TIA.



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 11:14 AM
link   
You're a good man, mepatriot. A very wise person, at that.

I think you're right... this movie, like many others produced by 'those in the know' hints at the same kind of "authorized" terrorist attack you have speculated about.

I don't find this convoluted at all considering all of the reinforcing information you have provided... protagonist's involvement with Rand, praise from TLC member, involvment of that Senator who was murdered but was claimed to have committed suicide...

great find and NOW I am going to watch that movie! I was going to stay away from it, but now that I know that it presents occult info in their own language... my interest has been sparked. thanks again, mepatriot, sir, and I wish you the greatest that existence has to offer.



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 11:27 AM
link   
Omega, Thank you for your kind words...I wish the same to you. Please be sure to post back here after you watch it, O.K?...and be sure to get the DVD version so that you can "still pause" and enlarge the images when those epiphanies are being displayed.



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 11:35 AM
link   
I'd honestly have to say, this is one of the best posts I've read. It's got everything that ATS asks for and more. I for one, don't really have an opinion on this, although it makes total sense. I guess i'll be waiting for November to come around.



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 11:41 AM
link   
THANK YOU IKN!!

Have you seen the movie?? If not, will you take a close look and see if you think I might really be on to something?? The more "beautiful minds" we get working on this, the better.

P.S. Don't broadcast 11/2, or any other date until we've all reached some kind of consensus here that we are looking at something that is worth talking about....I don't want any of this built on just one guy's (my) "paranoia." Group paranoia is so much more cozy, don't you think?? lol



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 11:52 AM
link   
Has anyone seen the movie?? I was really kind of hoping to get some meaningful feedback on this topic today, as I'll be going away soon, and will not be able to check back in for several days.



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 12:04 PM
link   
Sorry, but this thread is just dumb.

Deduct points, or do whatever, but someone had to say it.



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 12:21 PM
link   
Just saying things without backing them up with any intelligent information, or questions, or counter points, or anything is just dumb. Sorry, I just had to say it...we won't deduct "points" from you...you probably don't have that many to deduct.



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 12:23 PM
link   
Oddly, I have more than you, and secondly, I can come to a conclusion about an "attack" happening after watching ANY movie EVER made.



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 12:38 PM
link   
My IQ is pretty good...how do you know you have "more than" me??



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 01:26 PM
link   
I'm talking about ATS points brainiac.

Where did I say anything remotly close to refering to your IQ?

[Edited on 14-4-2004 by AnonymousPoster4]



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 01:30 PM
link   
So do those ats points get you riches and bitches?


/laughs and fades away



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 01:32 PM
link   
Forgive me for not giving a rip about an "ATS point" whatever that is...lol Glad you have more than me. I'm very happy for you, and so are all the people who measure their success by an "ATS point." lol Do you collect marbles too?? Better guard them carefully, it look like your losing a few there to me. lol



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 01:51 PM
link   
very good mepatriot, it also spark my interest in the movie. good man



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 01:58 PM
link   
This is one of the better threads in the predictions forum. I don't know what's lodged up AnonymousPoster4's butt, but it must be quite large.

mepatriot, I haven't seen the movie in question. I'll give it a view to see if I notice anything similar. I'm sorry that I couldn't provide you with the response that you're looking for. Someone on ATS must've seen the movie!

Lysergic, where you been brother?



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 02:30 PM
link   
The simple fact that this thread was spawned by a person who seems to be a paranoid agoraphobic, with conspirecy theory tendency's.



I just watched Die Hard 3, and it gave me clues to an attack:

1: There was a suitcase bomb in a park. That's the "what".

2. A riddle was, what's 21 out of 42. 21, or 2, 1.That's the "when". February 1st.

3. This took place in New York, and concluded on a boat. That's the "where".


So, a suitcase bomb will be placed on a boat in Ney York on February 1st.


OMG!!!!!

[Edited on 14-4-2004 by AnonymousPoster4]



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 02:54 PM
link   
And you're comparing that nonsense--with absolutely none of the indicators --(e.g. Covering-up his Rand Corporation connections, the quote about it being "real" by the director, the possible framing him as a schizo for supporting McCarthy, a Trilateral Commission member who never reviews movies giving the review, the hourglass, the eyeglasses, the futuristic technologies, the links to "Al Q'eda's" supposed communications m.o., etc., etc.) with my evaluation??

Wow, are you reality-challenged...and you call me paranoid!!

Where's that ignore button on this website? Do they have an ignore feature here somewhere?



posted on Apr, 14 2004 @ 02:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by AnonymousPoster4
The simple fact that this thread was spawned by a person who seems to be a paranoid agoraphobic, with conspirecy theory tendency's.



I just watched Die Hard 3, and it gave me clues to an attack:

1: There was a suitcase bomb in a park. That's the "what".

2. A riddle was, what's 21 out of 42. 21, or 2, 1.That's the "when". February 1st.

3. This took place in New York, and concluded on a boat. That's the "where".


So, a suitcase bomb will be placed on a boat in Ney York on February 1st.


OMG!!!!!

[Edited on 14-4-2004 by AnonymousPoster4]


I fail to see how the theories point to a fear of open places but we're entitled to our own opinions. Should we all attack you now? Lay off the attacks and either debate this or don't post.

Mepatriot, well-written. Whether someone thinks your theory is rubbish or not, the fact is you took the time to state your theory and provide your "proof". Good job.





top topics
 
1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join