reply to post by InfaRedMan
InfaRedMan states:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't provided any evidence that Reed is legit whatsoever. The only thing you brought to the game was a childish attitude. How can one hold any
conversation with you at all? What do we talk about with you? That posting on YouTube equates to unquestionable evidence?
Also, I'd like to point out that if you're going to keep ignoring people, you're in for a shock - if it hasn't already dawned on you. The facts
are that only 10 ignores can be managed at any one time. To ignore a new person (once you have met the quota of 10) means you must first remove
someone from your existing list. What a painful exercise hey!
Knowing you have a predictable habit of ignoring anyone who provides an argument you cannot compete with, I'd say that you're quota was met a long
time ago and that your simply bluffing in most instances.
I doubt the people you have legitimately ignored would loose sleep as they see the action for what it is... like most that come into this thread and
see you carrying on like a child. It's quite humorous and at the same time extremely tragic... but hey... thanks for the comic relief mate.
Every circus needs it clowns!
IRM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VisionandTruth:
Previously I stated when they resort to personal insults thats when I know Im basically 'winning'. Not verbatim. But you get the gist of what I
previously stated. For those who dont know how skeptics, debunkers, and disinfos operate, what they will usually do when they can refute evidence is
try and create an over emotional hostile atmosphere revolving around whomever theyve targeted. In this case it will be me. They will continue
attacking me on a personal level trying to initiate a response from me that will violate terms of service and then have me removed. These are the
trademark tactics utilized on the internet. This is nothing new to me.
Concerning IRMs remarks of me ignoring people. I ignore those who have shown themselves to be rather conveniently blind to what they have already seen
and have decided simply not to acknowledge the evidence presented. This trait of becoming conveniently blind to whats been presented is the trait of
someone who will not be reasoned with. Therefore to attempt to converse with someone who cant be reasoned with is, shall we say, stupid. I choose not
to be 'stupid' trying to talk to someone who can not and will not be reasoned with. And I removed then from my field of vision. Now if I have to
take someone off of ignore so be it. If you wanted this to be some form of stress on my every waking moment hate to tell you guy but Im actually not
concerned with compulsive message board tirates, other than laughing at them occasionally every now and again.
