It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grantbeed
im just trying to find out how you can tell by looking at someone and are most people in the positions i stated actually masons??
Originally posted by grantbeed
im just trying to find out how you can tell by looking at someone and are most people in the positions i stated actually masons??
Originally posted by grantbeed
hello,
since i was little my dad alsways said to me lots of company bosses, any companies, were mostly masons.
also people like golf club chairmen, etc too....
he always said he could tell if someone was a mason just by looking at them.
what did he mean by this??
also, i knew a real loser of a guy once who joineds the masons after being invited in. he went from having no job, no money and a bad car to having a good job, good car and money all within weeks!!!
crazy!!!
You can also find out if a man is a Mason just by asking. We aren't supposed to go around recruiting, but if someone asks usually you can't get us to shut up about it!
Originally posted by Masonic Light
You can't.
And joining the Masons doesn't increase your income.
Originally posted by tristar
What i would like to clarify, is that if one felt need to promote a new intended member and they would be responsible for them. Not everyone is allowed to invite. This also applies to which level the prior posters are referring to. As i have said, there is a hierarchy, hence the lower end has no direct contact with the high end. This assures stability, this is how governments are structured, this is how social order is structured. This assures that no agendas are leaked.
I can't tell if that's a question or a statement... "ambassador responsible for Western Europe"? I assume you mean Masonicly? No such position. Each country in Western Europe has one or more Grand Lodges that are autonomous. There's no body higher than them. While their actions may be in parallel much of the time, they are at odds with each other on any number of issues. Now, if you phrased that as "would you walk up to the Grand Master of a Grand Lodge and offer suggestions?" Sure, I would and could. Grand Masters are one year elected terms like most other officer bodies in Masonry (generally secretary and treasurer excepted, because it makes more sense not to have to retrain bookkeepers every year...) I've met the Grand Master of my state before, and would have no problem talking to him if I saw an issue I thought he could correct, or should at least consider. It's not like these guys are inaccessible... most of them have email addresses and phone numbers posted on Grand Lodge websites, after all...
Originally posted by tristar
Sir, i guess you could walk up to the ambassador responsible for Western Europe and begin talking to him on how the order should be changed or provide new ideas in strengthening its output.
Originally posted by tristar
Sir, i am not referring to elected bodies within individual lodges. I am referring to specific hierarchy which are and have and will be handed down based on generations of service.
Originally posted by tristar
Sir, i am not referring to elected bodies within individual lodges. I am referring to specific hierarchy which are and have and will be handed down based on generations of service. Do not confuse the two.
Originally posted by tristar
On that note, it is very interesting to see why there is so much antagonism on various sites and why many people are so confused.