WONDERFUL: Governments take without permission., page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 10-2-2009 @ 08:14 PM by Aakron
Everyone I know and virtually everyone in the world supports governments that take without permission. I feel alone in the shadows for not supporting it.

Why can the government take without permission? Because it is for the greater good? Stealing is okay when it is for the greater good? ... Or stealing is okay when it is for the greater good, but only if you work for the federal government. Or taking without asking is stealing unless you have a certain name... "uncle sam"? Are government taxes voluntary? No, not in any state I know. They take your money and they take it without permission.

The government makes the rules. Its a little odd to me that the only organization who makes the rules has made a rule that it can take without asking for the greater good, but nobody else is allowed to take without asking for the greater good "because it is wrong"... do as I say not as I do. Hypocrisy?

Why isn't being forced to labor 20%+ of your hours for the federal government purposes considered slavery? About 20% of my income goes to the federal government. 20% of my hours are government hours... 20% of my hours are federal government work hours. That is not slavery? I have a choice in the matter? I won't be punished if I don't put in the mandatory government work hours and tell uncle sam to shove it?

We all easily accept that being forced to work on a plantation is slavery. Being forced to work for the government is not slavery? Being forced to work 20% of my hours for the federal government is not slavery? Or am I to pretend that I'm not working for the federal government by force? When I give 20% of my wage and 20% of my labor to uncle sam? Or perhaps slavery is good and well as long as it is for the greater good. Perhaps we need to bring back plantations if a situation pops up showing they are for the greater good.

Oh, it is not that simple! Really? We didn't seem to need much taxes in 1776 in the United States of America when we revolted against taxes. We need property taxes. Really? We didn't need property taxes in 1776. It is impossible to collect the money through volunary means? Is it impossible to collect money for what is good for America through strictly moral means? Society will fail if we try to live a life where we do not advocate taking one's property without their permission? Examples? Somolia is an anarchic mess because there was too little taxes and no generous people there? The solution to Somolia's problems is taxes?

Our roads are necessary. Perhaps there is a moral means of collecting the resources to build and maintain them. Food is necessary. Perhaps there is a moral means of collecting the resources needed to feed our poor? Shelter is necessary. Perhaps there is a moral means to collect resources to provide shelter for those who need it? Perhaps taking without permission is not a moral means of doing so.

Perhaps we should not thow people in prison if they decide they do not want to pay the portion of their tax that goes to pay for the Iraq war. Perhaps we should not throw people in prison if they should decide to not want to pay the portion of their tax that goes to finance abortions. Perhaps we should not force people against their will to give up their posessions "for the greater good" because "we know better" because "we have higher morals we need forced on them". Perhaps we have low morals for taking their money with the threat of violence against them should they fail to pay up the extortions.

I'm not advocating no government here. I'm just posing some pointed questions that demand solid answers. I question the social contract. I question Obama's solution to our problems being forced labor... the "right to welfare"... the "right to a doctor's labor", the "right to other people's food", the "right to other people's labor". The right to take without permission, because of who you are, and because of what you're going to do with your spoils of extortion.


reply posted on 10-2-2009 @ 08:48 PM by David9176
reply to post by LostNemesis





You are lucky if you lose only 20% of your paycheck to income taxes, by the way. Many people I know, lose much more of their slavery hours to taxes.


And this doesn't include the taxes you pay on anything else you buy except for food...not including fast food.

Yes, in reality we are all double taxed. They tax our income then tax us on anything we buy. They tax your property. TAX TAX TAX

"The United States Government shall TAKETH and GIVETH away"


reply posted on 10-2-2009 @ 09:08 PM by David9176
reply to post by mpriebe81



You think it's bad now....the burden we are leaving on the generations to come is going to be FAR worse.

They will hate this generation with a passion for what has transpired.


reply posted on 11-2-2009 @ 09:19 AM by Aakron
reply to post by mpriebe81



Thanks, I'm glad to know I'm not the only one to feel the same way. I'm even shocked that nobody seemed to come in strongly with anything to tell me how I'm wrong. Like Newsweek says, Americans in general have become socialists. I guess maybe I should point my questions at other crowds.


reply posted on 11-2-2009 @ 10:02 AM by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by svpwizard



You're absolutely right.

And whn you shine this light onto the tax-lovers they come back with something along the lines of : "we pay that much and compared to other (usually European) countries we get so little in return?!" and the debate suddenly shifts from "end all taxation" to "tax us more so we can get all the neat 'services' the Euro-trash has become so dependent on" because the tax-lovers just love being taxed and the tax-haters figure looking to get 'value' from the extortion is a decent place to start.

Woo-hoo.

Destined for slavery.



reply posted on 12-2-2009 @ 02:19 AM by mental modulator
reply to post by Aakron



OP - based upon the responses you have received I would say you are fine.

I am not like you... I expect that a certain portion of my piss poor check to be gone
anyways. In fact I have never looked at my check and thought about the money I don't see, or better put I do not get caught up in it.

I will certianly be BBQed for saying it, but I don't mind putting into the system.

Although I would rather pay high state taxes and less fed, by reversing the two around.

I don't care if they stopped taxing the regular folks - but I do not trust CORPS- unlike government you cannot change them. So I am very pro top earner heavy taxation...
The only way I will change my mind on that is when I'm dead. Sorry you guys have to pay taxes.

BULLSEYE or CHRISnPITTS?




in fact I have a similar feeling towards the people who issue bills


reply posted on 12-2-2009 @ 03:22 AM by wutone
reply to post by mental modulator



Do you mind that the money you put into the system went into the bonuses of top "earning" Wall Street bankers?

Do you care if the taxes that regular folks are forced to pay go into "too big to fail" corporations?

Do you think that a government run by people who don't have to pay their taxes unless nominated to a Presidential cabinet spot is a government that can be changed?

Do you think that a certain portion of your check goes to the government contractors in highly overpriced amounts?

High taxes are a form of slavery. A certain amount of taxation is fair, we expect a national defense and basic infrastructure. This however is different. The government extracts your effort, time, and sweat to further the goals of those that are truly in charge.

The U.S. did fine without the system for its first 100 years, fought a civil war and recovered, fought the European superpowers Spain and Britain (and won), hugely expanded its territory, and set the foundations to be a superpower. The U.S. did this before the IRS existed, I am sure the U.S. will do just fine without the IRS and its Federal Reserve master.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 1 days ago with 18 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags
Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags
Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags