It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cnichols
Wonder how many people will say it's being taken out of context
AND LET ME SAY THIS TO ALL OF THE CHATTERING CLASS THAT SO MUCH FOCUSES ON THOSE LITTLE, TINY, YES, PORKY AMENDMENTS, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE REALLY DON'T CARE. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CARE FAR MORE THAT THERE'S A PROPOSAL IN THE BILL, THIS ONE I PUSHED, THAT GIVES A $2,500 CREDIT TO FAMILIES WHO PAY TUITION TO PUT THEIR KIDS THROUGH COLLEGE. GREAT RELIEF. THEY CARE FAR MORE ABOUT THAT THAN ABOUT SOME SMALL PROVISION IN THE BILL THAT SHOULDN'T BE THERE. BECAUSE THE TAX RELIEF FROM TUITION COSTS THAT THEY'RE GOING TO GET MEANS FAR MORE TO THEM. THEY CARE MORE ABOUT A PROVISION THAT KEEPS THE TEACHERS IN THEIR SCHOOLS.
Originally posted by cnichols
And as another poster stated, calling us the "Chattering Class" ...
How dare he?
I think he's talking about the Republicans in Congress that are going in and picking out the little "porky pieces" and focusing on them to get the American public to turn against support for the bill.
And let me say this to all the "Chattering Class" who are focusing on those little porky amendments: The American people really don't care.
He's talking TO the chattering class - ABOUT the American people.
The vast majority of the Republican Senators (36 of 41) agreed to oppose the Obama stimulus plan altogether and replace it with $3 trillion in tax cuts over the next 10 years. First of all, politicians love throwing out numbers like “10 years” because it gives a time frame which exceeds their term limitations. President Obama spoke many times during his campaign about making sweeping changes to energy policy in “10 years”
Aside from the continued Republican infatuation with tax breaks for the wealthy – and the politicized frame of reference – we should be alarmed by the provisions being “cut” in order to appease Republicans. This country desperately needs funding for education, research, energy and infrastructure. All of these areas saw their funding slashed by the Senate. This country needs fewer tax cuts and fewer rebates to the top income earners; “trickle down” economics are a proven failure. These areas saw their funding increase in the new Senate version.
Originally posted by nyk537
context included, it appears he meant what the OP implied he meant.
We're getting royally screwed here.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Our political machinery is either broken or OBSOLETE.