They passed it and now it is back to committee to reconcile this bill with the one the House passed.
Neither is good in my mind; more emphasis on spending than actual stimulus.
Now, we get to wait and see what the reconciled package looks like.
Here are some of the things they have to work out:
The price tags of the two bills are roughly the same: the House bill is $819 billion and the Senate's is $838 billion. The composition, however,
is different.
The House version includes more spending on education and aid to states, totaling about $100 billion.
The Senate's bill includes more in tax cuts, including $70 billion to patch the Alternative Minimum Tax. The tax was intended to target the wealthy,
but now hits many middle-class families.
The Senate version of the bill also makes changes to the president's signature middle-class tax cuts. Obama had campaigned on tax breaks for those
making $75,000 or less. The Senate version provides tax breaks for individuals making $70,000 a year or less or for couples making $140,000 a year or
less. That's different than the $150,000 in the House bill.
Some other differences between the two bills:
• The Senate bill, unlike the House version, would make the first $2,400 of unemployment benefits tax free. Both the Senate and House bills extend
the time that jobless workers can collect benefits.
• The Senate bill includes an amendment that would let those who buy a car in 2009 deduct the interest they pay on their car loan as well as the
sales tax charged in the purchase. The House bill doesn't include this provision.
• The Senate bill doubles the House's tax credit for first-time homebuyers to $15,000, a measure championed by Republicans in the Senate.
Source
[edit on 2/10/2009 by skeptic1]