Originally posted by mmiichael
I find this line of argument naive. Rothschild makes a quip about his banks being the power behind the throne of England in what, 1916? - and it's
taken literally. The world of power and economics is far more complex.
World power in the 20th Century moved to the American wallet. Their spending fuels the engine. When they overspend and go into debt, everything
contracts.
As far as banks go, what about Geneva and Zurich?
I keep hearing about the New World Order and am waiting to be told how they are different or worse than the Old World Order.
Greed and corruption seemed to have ruled the day for centuries.
MF
You can't say these bankers and money masters don't practically rule the world. I remember hearing something as well about Rothschild's minions
during the Napoleon War nearly crashing the market prior to one of Napoleon's victories. IIRC, it was in the Money Masters, it was on here in a
video. Not to mention the fact the Roman Empire's symbolism highly influenced this era's Illuminati.
You mention debt, but who was it who said "Let me control your money and I care not what laws are made"? Who profits off of all the wars that these
guys play both sides in, thereby creating massive national debts and creating odious debts on the third-world, thereby creating the many potential
enemies the US and others have?
Geneva, Zurich, all of them are connected one way or another to the World Bank banksters and others. You really think being enslaved to debt, working
as we do now to pay high taxes and censored when speaking out is BETTER? It's just another one of their greed mechanics in another form.
[edit on 15-2-2009 by Darky6K]