$1 Trillion Stimulus? Lets just build a NEW city!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 02:46 AM by southern_Guardian
Originally posted by wutone
Better yet, let us build a time machine, go back to 1996, and convince Clinton to grab Osama,


You mean the 1993 bombing when Clinton just took over after Bush Snr. When BUSH snr was warned. When Clinton continued to persue Bin Laden, WARNED the new Bush Jnr administration who did nothing to continue the search.

then the Iraq war, 9-11, or whatever, would have been prevented it all together.


Ill say this again.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 other than Bushes oil or personal business. It didnt have to happen.

Wheres Osama? 8years no Osama. Why the hell have we spent over $1 trillion and $200 million a day on a war that has nothing to do with 9/11, with our own economic issues? It has nothing.

And yet your covering Bushes ass and you have the nerve to use the whole government pupper tin hat theory. Really revealing.

Seriously though, isn't it getting a little tiring going on with these partisan attacks when it is clearly obvious that both parties are not acting in interest of the American people?


Partisan attacks? What the hell does a president purposefully lying about going to war with another nation that has nothing to do with 9/11 have to do with partisan attacks? Why is it that all conservatives have to cover Bushes ass? Would you grow a spine and admit the man, despite being a conservative that the vast majority of you folks paraded in 2000 and 2004, was a liar. Grow a spine and fess up.

Why dont you look beyond your own partisan BS and actually admit the man lied to us over the war. The man wasted $1.2 trillion of our tax payer money that could have been spent on these United states of america, or on the REAL war hunting that monster in Afghanistan. How about over 4000 patriotic lives could have been better respected in being sent to hunt down the man that had plenty to do with 9/11, not Bushes personal agenda in Iraq.

Grow a spine and fess up that the man lied. Stop covering his ass for the sake of your own ideology. The man lied to all of us, liberal and conservative. For petes sakes. And here you are, going on about government conspiracies. Real hypocritical.


reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 05:11 AM by 44soulslayer
Better yet, why not use the money towards something that will be ecologically beneficial?

en.wikipedia.org...

$1tr would be more than enough to stop the effects of global warming entirely.

The issue of course, is that it wouldn't create employment. The premise of Keynesian economics is that spending needs to be ramped up in order to disseminate money amongst people.

To demonstrate this, Keynes once threw a bunch of towels on the floor of a lavatory, claiming that it would give the cleaners more to do and thus stimulate the economy more.

Thus stimulus spending is less about efficiency. In fact the more inefficient it is, the better. Why have one man cleaning a building when you can hire ten- thus increasing employment.


reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 07:21 AM by Afrosamurai
I don't get it. For 8 years the GOP screamed "Destroy America by spending as much money on our buddies as possible!" Now that Obama is in they're crying about spending too much money. Seriously, they double the national debt so the people they went to college with could destroy America while buying more private jets, but cry about the American People getting a single dime from the government. Hmm, heard like 188million people filed tax returns. 188million... Let's give every one 10,000$. 1,880,000,000,000$! Instead of the two trillion the banks get and this new stimulus package we could spend 1.8trillion and give every tax payer 10,000$! Imagine how that would boost the economy! I know, the GOP says that's wrong, spending to much. So fine, remove the Republicans and divide that 1.8trillion up among the dems and independants so they get more then 10,000$! Hmm, how much of a boost would we have if debts were paid off and had money left? Instead of being stuch paying 280$ a month on a car payment and 125$ on a credit card bill they paid those off, had a little left over? Over 400 a month extra to spend! Also, the GOP now wants more tax cuts for the rich. TRICKLE DOWN DOESN'T WORK! Never has never will. Unless we trash their homes, burn their cars, and sink their boats. Then they'd have to buy new cars, fix windows, repaint house, and buy new boats. Instead of sitting on their billions, wiping their asses with 1,000$ bills, using million dollar bills to light their cigars, they'd spend them on cars and painters an cleaning crews and stuff!


reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 08:57 AM by 44soulslayer



reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 09:06 AM by Afrosamurai
reply to post by 44soulslayer



Oh come on really? We're giving BILLIONAIRES TRILLIONS of dollars, that won't cause inflation? How about we give less to the people who have less? Instead of the money going to private jets for Citi Bank we give the money to the people who owe loans to Citi Bank so Citi Bank still gets the money, but only after people paid off their debts.


reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 10:02 AM by 44soulslayer
Originally posted by Afrosamurai
reply to
post by 44soulslayer



Oh come on really? We're giving BILLIONAIRES TRILLIONS of dollars, that won't cause inflation? How about we give less to the people who have less? Instead of the money going to private jets for Citi Bank we give the money to the people who owe loans to Citi Bank so Citi Bank still gets the money, but only after people paid off their debts.


Calm down and go research the facts first.

You're giving billion dollar institutions billions of dollars. So first of all, please stop throwing around incorrect facts. None of the owners are billionaires, the money is going through the company to clear out toxic debts. If the owners simply keep the money, their institutions will go bust and they will be strung up to dry... like Fuld was when Lehmans went under. The rich elite own the vast amount of their wealth in shares. Mittal lost £25 billion in the last 6 months. The CEOs similarly lost millions when the shares fell- they are not as rich or untouchable as you think.

Now to the matter of inflation. Putting the money in at the top is precisely what slows the effect of inflation. If you give a billionaire a billion dollars, his consumer pattern will change very little. He will not buy any consumer staples in vast quantities, nor will he buy mid-range luxuries.

Now if you give the same amount of money to 1 million people, what will they do? They'll go out and buy cars, watches, fine food etc. This will ramp up prices- the phenomenon known as inflation. Expand this to the entire 300 million population of the USA and you should (hopefully) realise why the government can't simply print and hand out money to ordinary citizens. The money must go through a throttling intermediary to slow the effects of inflation.

If you think things are bad now, you won't enjoy hyperinflation.


reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 01:43 PM by wutone
LOL everyone with half a brain knows that Bush was a horrible leader.

Everyone with half a brain knows that the republicans just fart out of their mouth when they start spewing the "fiscal conservative" thing.

Republicans are politicians.

Most politicians lie. Most are corrupt.

Most politicians work for their own career and work for those that paid for them.

Most politicians could really care less about he people they represent and are only concerned about working just hard enough to sucker them in the next election while pushing the policies that favor their real benefactors.

But guess what?

Democrats are politicians too.

It takes half a brain to know that Bush and the republicans were pathetic, but use the other half and realize the democrats are pathetic as well.

Bush used fear mongering for a fat bailout saying that the sky will fall if nearly a trillion dollars were not given to the banks, yet half of that isn't even spent yet.

Obama is using fear mongering saying the sky will fall if nearly a trillion dollars isn't spent on a stimulus package where much of it goes to the institutions that supported Obama during the elections. So Obama is giving to the banks and ACORN at the same time.

See the pattern there.

Obama and the democrats are in control here, not Bush. Obama is pushing for this giant stimulus which only goes to a certain class of Americans while everyone else sucks the inflation and tax increases.

Stop ignoring the present while crying about the past.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 69 replies
Official Maine Caucus Results Thread!!
  2012 US Elections, Posted 6 hours ago, 61 replies