reply to post by JoanTheBlind
Joan, I might have missed it, but could you explain in a nutshell what you mean by "4D Positive/Negative"? I think I get 3d neutral, although I
think that would be the most difficult to achieve. With current technology available, more likely a 3d negative or decline with horrible consequences
lurking down the road.
In answer to your questions, I will offer what I seem to have learned from life.
J) (1) What is a Life-Cycle? How long is a life cycle (this will require a little bit of math on your part? What characterizes the (1) begining, (2)
the middle and (3) the end of a Life-Cycle?
P) A life cycle would be the major turning points in a life time. They tend to come in threes, and tend not to be sinusoidal, but more like
pulsating DC, either negative or positive. These major life cycles tend to divide the life up in a recognizable pattern, the first ending around 27,
the second around fifty, and of course the third at the end of ones productive life, which varies tremendously. The three cycles tend to follow the
typical three act play, or more accurately, the typical three act play tends to follow the cycles of life. The first act is one of discovery, where
one finds ones place in the world. The second act is where the plot thickens, and one begins to choose ones direction in the story, and the third act
is the conclusion of ones life in which it is discovered whether of not one has succeeded, and to what level, with ones goals.
J) (2) How do you suppose that Nibiru will "collide" with the Earth? Will it indeed end all of 3D existance as HH seems to indicate? Remember that
Nibiru collided with Earth about 4000 years ago.
P) Certainly no planet physically collided with Earth 4,000 years ago, or essentially all life on Earth would have been wiped out except perhaps
micro-organisms. I think maybe you mean, "How will Nibiru's close passage to the Earth effect our planet in this next visit". I will give you my
speculations. From my understanding the cycle is more around 6 thousand years, the last one around 4,000 BC, and then 10,000 BC, but even those
guesses are not accurate information. Should Niribu actually exist as a physical entity, and its passage has the influence on world climate change
that some evidence suggests to support, then there is no reason not to expect Earth wide natural disasters as before. Should Niribu be more of a
spiritual passage, something that exists primarily in a different/higher dimension, then I see different possibilities. First would be the Christian
concept of the Passage, in which those worthy souls leave for the higher dimension. Another possibility is that there is an exchange of the worthy
souls with those who come to Earth to be teachers. Either of these may be accompanied by an expulsion of those souls deemed to be too negative or an
evil influence. This could be through world wide natural disasters.
J) (3) According to HH, the Atlanteans chose negative, while the Mayans chose postive. Which do you think we will decide? Why?
P) Hmm. How do we know that the Atlanteans didn't pass to the higher dimension, and their existence was simply covered up? Also, there is
considerable evidence that the Mayans practiced human sacrifice, so HH might have these events backwards, and the evidence of the destruction of
Mayans was left behind as a message. Also, from my historical understanding, Mayan civilization fell apart around 1,200 AD due to drought, not not
2,000 to 4,000 BC, so the time line does not match. My guess is that we will not succeed as a whole, nor fail as a whole.
J) (4) To tie this into Bibilical prediction, it is said that after this process that there will be an Golden Age (aprox 2000 years, 1000 by biblical
accounting) of which the human race will live peacefully and with happiness during this time. Do you anticipate this happened?
P) Honestly, I expect a turn for the better, perhaps another age of enlightenment. I think technology has brought us to a point were we can either
succeed or fail as a species, although I think it is possible that we might see another world world war, this one far larger, and far more deadly than
the last. Maybe some arrival of a Niribu can save us from another far more destructive world war, and then again, maybe this war is a necessary
cleansing action that we will have to go through on our own, and perhaps, this Niribu might come to help pick up the pieces. Afterwords, maybe we can
enter a new age of enlightenment.
J) (5) Why do you suppose there are so many simularities between Armageddon predictions (ie. Law of One, this, Book of Revelations)? Any differences
you'd like to point out?
P) Well, there are always those predicting that the end is near. These predictions that continue to succeed tend to be written in very cryptic terms
that can be interpreted very broadly, which is why they survive through continuous dates of said destruction to be continuously reborn with a new date
for said next end of the world. Like the saying goes, there hasn't been an original story written since before Christ was a corporal. Thus, all
these stories of worlds end tend to be different versions of the same story, and so the similarities. The newer stories tend to incorporate science.
Now, they are not gods, but aliens/trans-dimensional beings coming to harvest our souls, which go to a higher dimension and level of understanding as
opposed to heaven.
Just my dime. Hope you enjoy.