It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
State Sen. Stephen Wise, a Jacksonville Republican, said he plans to introduce a bill to require teachers who teach evolution to also discuss the idea of intelligent design.
Wise, the chief sponsor of the bill, expects the Senate to take it up when it meets in March. He said its intent is simple: "If you're going to teach evolution,then you have to teach the other side so you can have critical thinking."
Originally posted by FSBlueApocalypse
then I believe we should have teachers present evidence that the Holocaust never happened, the value of pi is 3,
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by FSBlueApocalypse
then I believe we should have teachers present evidence that the Holocaust never happened, the value of pi is 3,
Sorry, mate. I have to disagree here.
The exact value of pi is not 3 and it never will be.
Read why pi is not 3 here...
Teaching topics with subjective answers may provide an opportunity to discuss alternate viewpoints. However, teaching students false facts about proven properties for numbers is wrong.
Intelligent Design has no basis in a Science classroom.
Originally posted by PopeyeFAFL
Intelligent Design has no basis in a Science classroom.
I cannot agree more with you. Intelligent Design (real name: creationism) is like cancer, unless you eradicate it completely, it will come back in a more vicious form.
That the beauty of science; someone observe, elaborate a theory, publish the results and the method used (meaning everyone is free to duplicate the experiment).
Someone can challenge the theory, but it will be made within the framework of science, using the same method, not belief or religion.
If it was not for science, we will still adore the Sun-God or some obscure beliefs.
When Obama mentioned that science will take it's rightful place, I hope he was not only thinking of science in government reports but also in the classroom.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Your not understand what he meant. But either way, you're argument has no proof either, we can't prove the big bang, and we can't prove intelligent design, therefore why not study both?
Originally posted by FSBlueApocalypse
And Evolution has mountains of evidence as well, while Intelligent Design has? Evolution happens, that's as much of a fact as Pi is 3.14. No legitimate Biologist accepts Intelligent Design just as no mathematician would accept Pi is 3.
Originally posted by xstealth
This Senator is correct, and the is no proof of the big bang evolution theory. The students need to hear both sides and make the decision themselves. You have to teach both sides of this.
Sorry if you don't like it, but this isn't your choice, its the students to decide what to believe.
Originally posted by FSBlueApocalypse
Originally posted by xstealth
This Senator is correct, and the is no proof of the big bang evolution theory. The students need to hear both sides and make the decision themselves. You have to teach both sides of this.
Sorry if you don't like it, but this isn't your choice, its the students to decide what to believe.
There is no nothing called the "Big Bang Evolution" theory so yes there is no proof. As for actual evolution, there is a lot of proof. DNA being the best. As I said, it would be equal to allowing Holocaust deniers to present their evidence to a history class.
Originally posted by xstealth
This Senator is correct, and the is no proof of the big bang evolution theory. The students need to hear both sides and make the decision themselves. You have to teach both sides of this.
Sorry if you don't like it, but this isn't your choice, its the students to decide what to believe.
I already sent in a "Letter to the Editor" and I'm just going to copy and paste that here as I think that sums up my thoughts on this