It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by semperfortis
Originally posted by stikkinikki
I thought that was the job of the Executive Branch to enforce the laws as they interpet. The Democrats did not control the House and Senate for all of GWs 8 years. Did Congress ask GW and Cheney and crew to waterboard those prisoners? Provide evidence please. Thank you mod.
1. No, The laws are interpreted by the Supreme Court, (As well as Appellate Courts to some extent)
2. The Democrats Controlled BOTH the House and Senate for the last 2 years of President Bush's Administration.
3. I was not aware that President Bush or Vice President Cheney Water-Boarded anyone. Source Please?
4. Name is Semperfortis, please refer here:
Moderators Are People Too. (and they have opinions)
Thank you
Semper
Originally posted by semperfortis
1. No, The laws are interpreted by the Supreme Court, (As well as Appellate Courts to some extent)
The White House said Wednesday that the widely condemned interrogation technique known as waterboarding is legal and that President Bush could authorize the CIA to resume using the simulated-drowning method under extraordinary circumstances.
******SKIP******
But in remarks that were greeted with disbelief by some members of Congress and human rights groups, White House spokesman Tony Fratto said that waterboarding was a legal technique that could be employed again "under certain circumstances."
Come on now...think a bit.
semper.....please do not 'cop out' with that stale 'argument'.
Originally posted by masonwatcher
How long has Obama been president and didn't he just announce the closure of Gitmo last week? One would presume that the prisoners were released under the Bush and Cheney watch, therefore, your ire should be directed at the previous administration for their incompetence.
You wouldn't deny that experience changes perception, and therefore actions, would you?
Originally posted by semperfortis
As for due process, Prisoners of war are not subject to the United States Criminal Justice System and therefor no due process.
Originally posted by Retseh
The point, i.e. that thing flying over your head, is that the expansion of this stupid policy of releasing people who want to kill us back into the wild, is now considered protected speech by the mainstream news media.
The Pentagon concedes it has no evidence to charge the majority of the 250 detainees with terrorism.