posted on Feb, 7 2009 @ 07:25 AM
i have a few observations, and one practical solution that cannot fail. i request , that even if u cannot implement my suggestion, the least you can
do is transmit this info to as many people, via internet and websites, as possible. this should help to activate someone to do something, and vast,
immediate and instant results should follow.
enough said. my observations are:
have you ever noticed that almost all decisions taken by someone in power, in any situation, from the smallest to the highest, are almost uniquely and
invariably taken by only one individual. it may seem to be a group decision, or the outward form may be seen to be a decision by many people. but at
the core, it is never so. all far reaching and life changing decisions, which affect us all, are always the result of decision making and control by
now think deeply about the above observation. think about it in your personal lives. lets say that you go for a loan, and that the loan is taking its
time or there are obstructions. if you think about it, there will be someone somewhere , in the organization which is giving you that loan, who knew
and knows the weakness in your case, and who probably also knows just what is required to be done in order to get it approved in a jiffy. think about
it. it might be the person with whom you are dealing, or it might be someone in the backoffice whom you never met. but believe me, that person knows
how to get the deal approved. or it could be a person in power in that organization, who for some reaso or other, is not allowing the approval, as it
is in his power to do so.
now, assume the person in that person decides to approve it. remember, there has to be an element of arbitrariness in his power, otherwise the
decision of the loan approval could be programmed into a computer, and there would be no need to have any interactions with any personnel to get the
loan approved. now if that person approves it, it will be because he has the power to do so, which automatically means that it becomes his liability.
the point here is not about his liability, the point being made is that the decision rests with only one person always.
even where guidelines have been formulated, this is so (it is more so, because the very word guidelines implies that a lot of leeway exists in the
decision making process, as it is not possible to consider all possible situations, hence the guidelines)
even in big companies, where many directors are present, it has and always will be the will and decison of one person which is being approved,
although due to the persons influence with the others, he may get the others to vote along with him. but should the decision maker choose, he can make
an opposite decison, and it too will be approved by the rest of them.
this basic observation applies in each and every situation. basically, only one person is always responsible for any important decison, no matter how
many people may seem to be involved, while the others just go along.
solution:: if you can identify this one person, and attack him in any way (take this in any way that you like, since we are talking of issues that are
lifechanging, not just getting a loan approved) then you are on your way to a solution. with that one person removed, perhaps another one will take
his place. but if the new person knows (or is threatened with) the fact that the earlier person was attacked/killed/removed/whatever due to such and
such a reason, and also the fact that the new person will also face the same situation, i think you will begin to see the power of my suggestion. the
power comes because at any given time, you only need to attack one person, and this can be done with few people and few resources. THERE IS ONE FINAL
CONDITION IN ALL THIS. WHATEVER YOU DO, YOU SHOULD NEVER BE IDENTIFIED. OR THEY WILL COME AFTER YOU. ISN'T THIS WHAT HAS BEEN DONE TO US TO MAKE US
AS POWERLESS AS WE ARE TODAY.