reply to post by thomas_
Yes, I truly get all of that. But it is a matter of perspective. And it's not used to illustrate or give understanding of the 2D, it's used to
show the relation between 2D and 3D so that one can understand what the 4th Dimension is.
These are explanations of the 4th Dimension, not of the 2nd. It's to help someone understand how to imagine the 4th Dimension. The very act of
showing it from the side is what creates the height dimension. In that picture that shows the height, you aren't viewing it in a 2d perspective,
you are still looking at in the 3d perspective.
Yes, 2d exists in 3d, and 3d exists in 4d, which we can see with time, and then on and on.
As for the father stuff. Yes, the father knows all and I have a limited perception and so on. But, these things do not define who or what I am,
rather they define my individual experience among many. My individual perspective among many.
Imagine for a minute that you are all knowing. That you knew every possible thing that could happen, from the start and end of time. All things
are known. In this state, the universe is static. It doesn't move, there is no time. This is the perspective of the father, which nobody can be
equal too.
This would be like taking a movie film and stretching the film from start to finish. You are viewing the entire movie at once. It's static, it has
no change, it has no time. But, when you take this and limit the perspective to only 1 frame at a time, you now have created the illusion of time,
change and so on. And we of course are watching the movie, the limited perspective.
It appears to us that this is a linear time, just like a single movie film. However, when all is known and all possibilities exist, then it is not
just a single movie film, it is many films, each "side by side", "stacked on top of each other" and so on. I use quotes because these are not
literal directions in 3d.
So, these films stacked become 4d, those become stacked into 5d, and so on. This is where sacred geometry comes in, because the flower of life
reveals these shapes.
The choices you make determine your linear path across this universe. So while it appears you are on a linear path in a 3 dimensional universe, this
is not the truth. And this is where religion and such comes in, not to be confused with the junk the church and organized religions sell.
This is how you reap what you sow. Because when you sow, you are making a choice that determines the path you take. And that path will lead to
what you reap. This is no different than action and reaction, but you have the ability to choose actions that create reactions. So that is what I
mean by I am the cause, not the result. Because I can choose otherwise. Where a rocket has no choice and follows the laws of physics in it's
path, I can choose to go elsewhere.
And this is exactly what the entire end game is on this planet. To limit and narrow your choices. To get you stuck in traps like duality, and to
get you on the level of action and reaction. Because then those with control can initiate actions that will cause the reaction they want in you,
just like they can determine the path of that rocket. Only if people wake up and see these are not the only paths, that they have choice and so on
will they no longer be subject to such measures of control.
The truth sets one free, all this talk about being a part of creation, being a part of the logic and so on is talk towards being in bondage and being
more easily controlled by actions. As if there is no choice or free will, as if we are stuck on a linear film strip and just have to accept what
the director has given us. You are your own director, but you had better be wise in your choices because you reap what you sow. The hypocrite
however sows that which they point out as bad, and so reap the same.
