Originally posted by bigvig316
You know not all the Bush and Chaney did was bad. The fact that we never had another 9/11 is proof that some of the policies that they endorsed helped
to protect us. They did what needed to be done at the time in order to make a more secure nation. And if Chaney is going to give a warning it should
be takes seriously. Besides who is Keith Olbermann to tell any one to go away. We can say the same about his leftist views. What if Bill O'Reilly
said the same thing about a democrat?
I think Keith Olbermann should leave the USA and hop over the border
to Canada. He can get free health care up there.
The liberals would love to have him.
He may have to pay $41,000 for a new minivan.
GST?
|
If I find myself in a fight to the death, I want the biggest, coldest, meanest, SOB's on my side.
If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your planning is absent, and your execution positively sucks.
When 9-11 occurred, here in the US we were pissed. I know it's been a while but we were mad, we wanted revenge, and we wanted action.
We got it.
I wouldn't care if they gloved up and ripped a terr's throat out through his pucker.
Waterboarding?
If the lives of my family, friends, neighbors, and countrymen are on the line, I'd take any measure, at any level, requiring any action to stop them,
niceties be damned.
Cheney was tough. When we needed tough.
Like the gunfighters hired as a Marshall in the old West when the killing and drinking got completely out of hand. He'd come in, bust heads, shoot
those who needed it, and as soon as he bought the town some breathing room, he was fired.
Folks sure are quick to forget.
I like Cheney. He was the right man in the right place at the right time.
I can't say the same about Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld. Wasn't half as smart as he thought he was.
And at the end of the day, the President has to rely on intelligence received, as he has little control over how it was obtained, or just how accurate
it is.
If you have an actionable threat, which way would you prefer the President to act? Ignore things as did Clinton, or act on the side of prudence and
take action?
I know which I prefer, and since we were never hit again under Bush and Cheney's watch, they must have been doing something right.
|
reply to post by dooper
When 9-11 occurred, here in the US we were pissed. I know it's been a while but we were mad, we wanted revenge, and we wanted action. We got it.
Maybe you got it. I didn't get it. Osama, you know, the man behind the attacks, was never caught.
[edit on 8-2-2009 by NativeAmerican]
|
Bigvig316
You are naive Sir.
Bush and Co. have raped the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, not to forget the Human Basic rights, and you sit at your computer and try and defend
their actions... Wake up man!
|
First I want to say..Olbermann is horrible on the sports side...and worse on the political side. I heard Glenn Beck mentioning that GE(parent company
of MSNBC) might get federal aid- especially since Immelt is now on Obamas economic advisory panel..Does that mean Olbermann would get the salary max
of 500K?
|
|
