Originally posted by rocksolidbrain
Well, exactly the same thought came to me, when I moved the wheel for the very first time !
The wheel is infact doing work for FREE, even if its a tiny amount.... There goes the law of conservation of energy and whole of the physics just
crashed.
Althought, it does take effort and 'energy', but not of the kind we talk of in physics. Energy in a physical sense is not being consumed from
anywhere, not at least from a known physical source. This fact itself is world changing.
Hey rock, can I give you some tips?
We are dealing with new things here. Mind over matter. No scientist will
admit anything that he cant measure with the current equip. our tech
now has.
Here is something i wrote sometime ago in the pdf on my sig:
Advanced Training
Introduction
The value of really understand new things should not be underestimated. There is no point of going back to mysticism. This value, achieved by belief
systems and logics, is the foundation to start letting things happen. Observation, joined with questioning, is an excellent tool for the subconscious
build up of the never ending battle to overcome fear and
doubt. With observations we can reach logical conclusions, and raise new questions that will challenge and evolve the current belief systems. Do not
resist change. Change is the fuel to reach out to new experiences and new grounds. If any given system cannot change, it cannot evolve.
The pattern here is always to break the system.
The logics of any experiment
Here we present something for you question and break. The point here is show observations of PK experiments and relate logically to them, with some
things intentionally left in abstract form.
To begin, let us define some points. The interrogation symbol “?” marks something abstract. Its there but it is a belief system on its own terms.
It is defined by the observer, not the presenter of formula. It’s not a mathematical symbol either; it just functions like a modifying vacuum that
encapsulates different entities.
This first part of the proposal goes along this line.
SUCCESS = INSIDE ? OUTSIDE.
This is the logical thinking that what goes inside influence the outside. Mind over matter, simple as that. Let’s define the first part:
INSIDE = ( A ? B ? C ? YOU).
A = What is the experiment;
B = What action is needed in the experiment.
C = Your experience over this experiment.
YOU = What happens inside you.
Lets propose what macro happens inside you into four main parameters:
YOU = ( BELIEF ? DOUBT) ? (LOGICS ? FEAR).
If you could not understand this premise, the textual explanation of this metaphysical equation goes like this: The agent of transformation (YOU) is
the duality of two groups defined by belief and doubt (left), fear and logics (right). So, by this definition, the prerogatives to achieve success
involve knowing what it is to do (the experiment, the action over the experiment) and know your Self. There is a purpose and a goal (of any given
experiment) and there’s you and all that goes on your mind: belief,
doubt, fear, logics.
Moving on, let’s check the latter part of the equation:
SUCCESS = INSIDE ? OUTSIDE.
OUTSIDE = Proximity ? Visual ? Interferences ? Physics.
The outside can be tricky as well, because of the “science” factor of trying to explain things from a mechanic view that leaves out PK and put
effort on the interferences that can be influencing the whole thing. This is complete logics, and are secondary parameters to the inside, or YOU.
Lastly, there is some basic math involved.
SUCCESS = INSIDE ? OUTSIDE.
SUCCESS = 10 We completely achieved the purpose of said experiment.
SUCCESS = 5 We see results that indicates some achievement.
SUCCESS = 1 We see micro naked eye changes to initial status of experiment.
Ok, but le me add this: there’s a binary outside observance that just states: it affects (1) and don’t affect (0). But we know that between ZERO
and ONE there are infinitesimal changes that the naked eye can’t see.
One person could almost reach the point of (1) and don’t know how far of ‘the edge’ is at. There is a jump here or a ‘leap of faith’ if you
like the term. Along within the line (0,0000 and 0,9999) there is no output visual credibility that you can stomp your feet in the ground and say
“Its working!”
SUCCESS = 01,00 We see micro naked eye changes to initial status of experiment.
SUCCESS = 00,99 Nothing happens.
SUCCESS = 00,02 Nothing happens.
SUCCESS = 00,01 Nothing happens.
Before the minimum success of any experiment, there is this place of not happening, which is evidently is shown by a PAUSE, or “activation time”
of said experiment.
PAUSE = The eminency of the first micro and naked eye results.
To finish the proposed equation:
SUCCESS = PAUSE ? ( INSIDE ? OUTSIDE).
This is the system for you to brake. If you feeling you are not advancing PK, you are at the pause and the calibration of YOU parameters that changes
inside and outside.
The key here is to explore changes and search for the truth, until your jump is complete.
Hope this helps...
[]´s
RP