It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

‘Alien Donuts’ In Space! Too Much Of A Coincidence To Be Debunked?

page: 17
30
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 06:24 PM
link   
reply to post by mikesingh
 

Hi,I have just been watching a video shot by a Brazilian film crew and noticed one of these donuts,here is a catch from the video.I have blown it up for more detail.



Although The video is poor, and you might want to turn off your sound.

Lewtra.

Edited for Clarity





[edit on 15/2/2009 by lewtra]

[edit on 15/2/2009 by lewtra]




posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by depthoffield
 


Your "cat eye" effect may be oval in shape, but where is the hole in the center? Where is the moving pulsing black line from center to outer edge, and most importantly, where is the morphing notch where in the sts video, some are square, some are double square, some are triangular shaped.??

Picking photos that mimick the sts video objects hardly proves anything friend.

Lets see some difinative video motion conclusive evidence that will clearly define the sts objects as simply being lens anomalies.

That has yet to be done.

Something tells me that we will be waiting for that for some time. Guess I need to make several pots of coffee for this one.



Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 06:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by RFBurns
Where is the moving pulsing black line from center to outer edge
What pulsing black line, the one you say it's missing from the slow motion versions I posted?



posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 07:05 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


The moving, pulsing black line that is clearly seen in the sts 75 video.

The black line moves from center to outer edge in the pulsing rythmic pattern on those objects. Surely you have seen it?



Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 07:17 PM
link   
reply to post by RFBurns
 


No, I haven't seen that line, that was why I made those slow motion videos, to try to see if there was any thing like that, and in which, apparently, you also could not see the black line, judging by your comment:

If your using each frame from the source video, we should be seeing the center to outer edge pulse line (black) make its way through the object.



posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 07:21 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


No thats not what I meant.
What I meant was that if your slow motion video used every frame from the original video, we should see that line make its way slowly from the center to the outer edge.

Remember that image I posted from the capture of the object, the one that had the scan lines? In that capture you can see that black line, its about half way across the surface of the object. That is the black line I am talking about. In that video, that line moves from the center to the outer edge as the object pulses.


Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 07:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by RFBurns
No thats not what I meant.
What I meant was that if your slow motion video used every frame from the original video, we should see that line make its way slowly from the center to the outer edge.
I should have said it on my answer to the post where you said that, I noticed now that I did not explicitly said it, so I say it now.

There are no missing frames on my slow motion videos.

Or do you mean that I should have made a slow motion version of the whole video?

If you can show what object you want me to follow and the time it appears on the video I can make a slow motion version of that object moving.

Edited to add:

This image?


[edit on 15/2/2009 by ArMaP]



posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 09:16 PM
link   
some good evidence presented of how the tether "UFO"'s could be a result of the cameras inability to render small dust particles out of focus. However like RF Burns has highlighted, why do the UFO's seem to pulsate? Why do they all have different angles for their "notches"?



posted on Feb, 15 2009 @ 11:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP

No, I haven't seen that line, that was why I made those slow motion videos, to try to see if there was any thing like that, and in which, apparently, you also could not see the black line, judging by your comment:
...If your using each frame from the source video, we should be seeing the center to outer edge pulse line (black) make its way through the object.


Ok, I hope your sitting down.


(click to open player in new window)


See the black line now?



Cheers!!!!

[edit on 15-2-2009 by RFBurns]



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 12:11 AM
link   
I hope that didnt scare anyone off now. No worries. Its just a little space creature pulsing around a tether checking it out with its friends.





Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 12:21 AM
link   
reply to post by RFBurns
 


I always enjoy good Bioform footage, thanks RFBurns!

Here is what has already been written about these creatures in Trevor James Constable's The Cosmic Pulse of Life :

-The existence of these organisms seems to be essentially plasmatic, i.e. having their form expressed in heat substance. They travel in pulsatory fashion, swelling and shrinking cyclically as they move through the air..." [p.84]

-Being plasmatic, they are capable of returning radar echoes, and often do...Motion pictures we made verify that these plasmatic organisms are capable of velocities and changes in shape and size that render worthless any attempt to handle them with the mechanistic mode of mentation" [p.85]

-Pulsation of these biological aeroforms - the natural and ineviitable concomitant of life is pulsation - provided further...confusion (for those) with mechanical notions. The pulsation was interpreted wherever seen...as due to the "power source" or "power system" of the UFO. The concept that such pulsation was equivalent to man's own heartbeat (was never considered)..." [p.100]

-...Prompted by observed pulsations of UFOs sighted at high altitudes by its pilots, the USAF once broached the idea of "space animals" in a public release dated 27 April 1949, stating that the objects appeared to act more like animals than anything else.

-The airmen who observed these aeroforms...expressed the feeling that they were living organisms..." [p.34]


*Trevor Constable suggests a new science "of macrobiology, or even macrobacteria" [p.129]; the prefix "macro-" indicating the huge size of these organisms:

"The objects are seen to come and go, change their shape, number and position all in this brief period. Ships from other planets? The scene is more like the action perceivable through a microscope!"


[edit on 16-2-2009 by Exuberant1]



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 12:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Exuberant1
 


Indeed!

One thing is certian, there is no proof anywhere that clearly shows creatures of this nature do not or could not exist.

The closest example we can show is the glowing sea going jelly fish and other light emitting sea creatures, some that do pulse their light and in rythmic patterns.

We do know that life consists of energy, heck our own bodies produce energy, sending electrical pulses from our brain through nerves causing reactions in muscles. We also know that life produces an aura as can be seen through Krilian photography. Even non-organic material emits an aura.

Life is energy...energy is life.



Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 05:15 AM
link   
reply to post by RFBurns
 


"We also know that life produces an aura as can be seen through Krilian photography. Even non-organic material emits an aura. "

I just spent some time researching Kirlian Photography, and I am intrigued.

I am especially intrigued by the unique properties of this form of photography insofar as it's apparent capability to capture on film the 'aura' of a severed portion of a plant;

I would very much like to see this phenomena in person:


*Was not a 'unique' form of photography also used to capture on film the myriad STS UFOs? ;-)



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 11:01 AM
link   
reply to post by Exuberant1
 


Yep, our aura is always there no matter if we loose a limb, it will show through Krilian photography.

Just like that leaf with the cut section, the aura is still present.

Removing the physical is just that, physical. The energy patterns..our aura..remains.


Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 11:15 AM
link   
I'd sure like a picture taken of myself using 'Kirlian Photography'.




What can I say? .. I have strong aura inside.


Edit: Thanks guys, I never knew that this type of photography existed, great posts. Better go inform my photographer buddy about a new possible project.



[edit on 16/2/09 by Majorion]



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 11:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Majorion
 


Did you know that our aura changes in intensity based on how we feel?

It has been documented that our aura can increase in intensity when we are angry, or happy, and can decrease when we feel sick, sad or depressed.

The "critters" in the tether video obviously increase their energy output, or aura as they float nearby that tether. Similar to how a light emitting jelly fish increases its luminance if it gets frightened or threatened.



Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by RFBurns
It has been documented that our aura can increase in intensity when we are angry, or happy, and can decrease when we feel sick, sad or depressed.

You mean our vibratory state. Yeah, the 'law of attraction' is pretty popular in this day and age. I agree with most of the concept, but not to the extent of calling myself God, or that all of us are 'God' and so on.. It's pretty much true.. everything in the universe is energy, at the atomic/molecular level, we're probably made up of the same which a star is made up



Originally posted by RFBurns
The "critters" in the tether video obviously increase their energy output, or aura as they float nearby that tether. Similar to how a light emitting jelly fish increases its luminance if it gets frightened or threatened.


Yeah, but those are just "ice particles", or "lens anomalies" right?




[edit on 16/2/09 by Majorion]



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Majorion

Yeah, but those are just "ice particles", or "lens refractions" right?





Is that what they are???? Oh dear...I must rush off to the Brookings institute and tell them that there are pulsing life like ice particles causing lens anomalies up in low Earth orbit before its too late and causes a major panic and we get people running around screaming the sky is falling!!




Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by RFBurns

The "critters" in the tether video obviously increase their energy output, or aura as they float nearby that tether. Similar to how a light emitting jelly fish increases its luminance if it gets frightened or threatened.



Oh, do tell... Why should the "critters" be afraid of or feel threatened by the tether?


And by the way, people like you are doing more harm to ufology than any "debunker" or "disinfo agent" could ever hope to achieve. But you sure are entertaining.



posted on Feb, 16 2009 @ 11:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by sebarud

Oh, do tell... Why should the "critters" be afraid of or feel threatened by the tether?


Man people can literally mis-interpret anything out here cant they. Perhaps you never heard of "example" before?

Those "critters" could simply be curious..perhaps that increase in energy is some kind of sensory preception, or put in lamen terms, scanning that tether. After all, it is a "forign" object that is charged with energy.

Tell me...when something odd or strange enters your paradyme and scares you, does your heart rate jump? Do you pant? I bet if we took a Krilian picture of you at that point, your aura would be lit up like the strip in Las Vegas!!



Originally posted by sebarud
And by the way, people like you are doing more harm to ufology than any "debunker" or "disinfo agent" could ever hope to achieve. But you sure are entertaining.


Really? In what way? Just for your info, I happen to not be the only one who has theorized that these objects could be living things.

Check the research dating back to 1996, the very day this video, which was seen LIVE that day, when the debate began. The first theory in fact was that they were living things, not hardware craft UFO's.


Cheers!!!!



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join