Michael Phelps, hypocrisy and American Drug Policy, page 18
privacy
reply posted on 25-2-2009 @ 04:47 PM by mattifikation
reply to post by saint4God
That post amounts to nothing more than "Na-na-na-na-boo-boo, yooouu got in trooouuuble!"
I know it must feel great to know that nobody can specifically address your lame rhetoric without violating the new rules, but you should keep it to yourself anyways. We can all do without juvenile parting shots, thank you very much.
That post amounts to nothing more than "Na-na-na-na-boo-boo, yooouu got in trooouuuble!"
I know it must feel great to know that nobody can specifically address your lame rhetoric without violating the new rules, but you should keep it to yourself anyways. We can all do without juvenile parting shots, thank you very much.
reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 01:49 AM by mattifikation
reply to post by saint4God
You're right, the answer is clear. The ban was enacted not due to rational debate, but because of people supposedly telling stories that need not be told. I suggest you look into it more, because apparently you've come to a big misunderstanding of the reason behind the ban.
It's generally a silly idea to speak of denying ignorance when it seems to have filled the pool you've been diving into.
You're right, the answer is clear. The ban was enacted not due to rational debate, but because of people supposedly telling stories that need not be told. I suggest you look into it more, because apparently you've come to a big misunderstanding of the reason behind the ban.
It's generally a silly idea to speak of denying ignorance when it seems to have filled the pool you've been diving into.
reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 01:56 AM by Kryties
Originally posted by saint4God
Don't hate, appreciate. The idea is that if it's 'violating the new rules' that there must be some reason for the 'rules' well worth investigating. Could it be that there is some kind of substantiation? Could it be this is another move to 'deny ignorance'? The answer is clear and now mandated.
Ummmm, sorry to burst your little bubble there but the reason the ATS OWNERS have given is because it is against ATS rules to discuss drugs in terms of personal use. Some idiots have been doing just that and have detracted from the purpose of intelligent discussion about the topic. The reason is that it shows up on search engines and gives the wrong impression to potential new readers.
It has NOTHING to do with the fact that ATS takes your side of the argument. Nice try though.
I strongly suggest you peruse this forum for clarification on what I just said:
The END of the discussion of illicit drugs/mind altering substances on ATS (The experiment failed)
In this thread, negotiations are currently being carried out to the purpose of creating a separate Drugs forum that is strictly moderated with 'personal use' posts being deleted etc.
Please, for the love of the god that you believe in, PLEASE DENY IGNORANCE.
[edit on 27/2/2009 by Kryties]
reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 09:21 AM by TNT13
reply to post by saint4God
Well we're talking about marijuana here not narcotics, per the subject of the thread. So I'd suggest instead of being cocky you find the right thread to talk about NARCOTICS in because this clearly isn't it. If you can't understand that I doubt I'm going to be very much help illuminating the difference.
Well we're talking about marijuana here not narcotics, per the subject of the thread. So I'd suggest instead of being cocky you find the right thread to talk about NARCOTICS in because this clearly isn't it. If you can't understand that I doubt I'm going to be very much help illuminating the difference.
reply posted on 27-2-2009 @ 09:24 AM by saint4God
Originally posted by TNT13
Well we're talking about marijuana here not narcotics, per the subject of the thread. So I'd suggest instead of being cocky you find the right thread to talk about NARCOTICS in because this clearly isn't it. If you can't understand that I doubt I'm going to be very much help illuminating the difference.
- www.merriam-webster.com...
Main Entry: 1nar·cot·ic
Function: noun
1 a: a drug (as opium or morphine) that in moderate doses dulls the senses, relieves pain, and induces profound sleep but in excessive doses causes stupor, coma, or convulsions b: a drug (as marijuana or LSD) subject to restriction similar to that of addictive narcotics whether physiologically addictive and narcotic or not
2: something that soothes, relieves, or lulls
Being that even the most basic of definitions aren't understood, this explains why attempts at more complex modes of differentiation are futile.
[edit on 27-2-2009 by saint4God]
Iraq and Afghanistan veterans to return their medals to protest war on terror at Chicago NATO summit
Posted 10 days ago with 82 member flags
Posted 10 days ago with 82 member flags
Blatant Corruption Exposed as EU Blocks France\'s Ban on Monsanto\'s GMO Maize
Posted 3 days ago with 81 member flags
Posted 3 days ago with 81 member flags
Fukushima fuel pool is urgent national security issue for America, \'top threat facing humanity\'
Posted 19 days ago with 80 member flags
Posted 19 days ago with 80 member flags
Shocking Video Of Kelly Thomas Beating Death Released. Watch With Caution.
Posted 18 days ago with 71 member flags
Posted 18 days ago with 71 member flags
Electricity generated from water: BlackLight Power announces validation of its scientific breakthrou
Posted 4 days ago with 65 member flags
Posted 4 days ago with 65 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
BREAKING: Sphere Deflects Solar Eruption! May 25, 2012 - SunsFlare
Space Exploration: 12 hours ago, 44 flags
Space Exploration: 12 hours ago, 44 flags
TV Networks Say You're Breaking The Law When You Skip Commercials
Science & Technology: 15 hours ago, 20 flags
Science & Technology: 15 hours ago, 20 flags
Freedom watch: Not a single Democrat voted in favor of ending FDA raids on raw milk farmers
Breaking Alternative News: 15 hours ago, 12 flags
Breaking Alternative News: 15 hours ago, 12 flags
U.S. Army General: The Whole Northern Hemisphere is at Risk of Becoming Largely Uninhabitable
Breaking Alternative News: 14 hours ago, 11 flags
Breaking Alternative News: 14 hours ago, 11 flags
Oakland City Council Cowers In The Face Of Brutal Truth
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 7 hours ago, 10 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 7 hours ago, 10 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
TV Networks Say You're Breaking The Law When You Skip Commercials
Science & Technology: 15 hours ago, 64 replies
Science & Technology: 15 hours ago, 64 replies
Kansas governor signs 'Shariah bill' to ban Islamic law
Breaking Political News: 15 hours ago, 62 replies
Breaking Political News: 15 hours ago, 62 replies
Bombshell: Half of U.S. Lives in Household Getting Benefits
US Political Madness: 16 hours ago, 49 replies
US Political Madness: 16 hours ago, 49 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.089 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.089 seconds
