reply to post by skeptic1
Actually, they don't say that, specifically, that I could see. And that's what concerns me. These articles talk about "pay", which, to me, means
salary.
Only when they talk about "total compensation" can we be sure they're including bonuses, as Claire McCaskill proposed here:
"I do know this: We can't just say, 'Please, please,'" said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., who has proposed that no employee of an institution
that receives money under the $700 billion federal bailout can receive more than $400,000 in total compensation until it pays the money
back.
This worries me, too:
The administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the plan had not yet been made public, said the most restrictive limits
would apply only to struggling large firms that receive "exceptional assistance" in the future. Healthy banks that receive government infusions of
capital would have more leeway.
Banks and other financial institutions that receive capital infusions, but are considered healthy, could waive the $500,000 salary cap and the stock
restrictions under the new Obama rules.
If they were "healthy banks", they wouldn't have needed government infusions. EVERYONE who received TARP funds should be capped. They have proven
that they can't handle it themselves and would have failed without the government.
Source
I'm wondering if this is just for show...

I'll have to see the details.
[edit on 4-2-2009 by Benevolent Heretic]