Originally posted by 44soulslayer
Why did Obama claim to totally, 100% back Daschle even after the allegations came out?
He shouldn't have. He should have asked Daschle (and Geithner) to step down, IMO. I can only say he probably didn't think the infraction was "that bad". But he's wrong. He set himself up to be the transparency and integrity president and now he's going to have to live up to it or face serious criticism.
Why did he push through the nomination of Geithner?
I think Obama thinks that Geithner is the best person for the job. I'm not so sure.
Is he really sorry that he made a mistake when only 24 hours ago, he was denying that anything was untowards?
I suspect he's really sorry. Sorry that the vetting process was apparently insufficient to catch these issues and that he set such high standards that he's now going to have to live up to. I don't think he knew about Daschle's problems before the appointment, but once he found out about them, he should have taken action instead of 100% supporting the appointment.
Then again, if he asked Daschle to step down, he's accused of "throwing him under the bus". He really can't win here.
I do think he's learning a valuable lesson about how suspicious and diligent the American people are these days. He's living in the post-Bush era. People are WATCHING. Because we don't want to be fooled again. Your know what they say... Fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.
Just my thoughts.



