The Reality Of FEMA Camps And The Martial Law Apparatus, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 3-2-2009 @ 11:14 AM by L.HAMILTON

The Reality Of FEMA Camps And The Martial Law Apparatus


www.roguegovernment.com
There is no doubt that the government is preparing a nationwide system of detention facilities under the guise of emergency management that could be used to house large quantities of Americans during a time of civil strife. Many think that it is a conspiracy theory, but it is not. It is a fact that the federal government has many facilities right now that can be used to house large numbers of political dissidents if the need arises. During World War II, the U.S. government through an executive order by FDR
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 3-2-2009 @ 12:25 PM by detachedindividual
Originally posted by MoonMine
Originally posted by detachedindividual
What would you prefer, massive numbers of rioters and looters armed to the teeth robbing/murdering/raping whoever they find allowed to roam free, or having them detained in camps because the prison population is overflowing?


This is a very, very dangerous chain of thought you have there my friend.

Who is going to decide who is a rioter and a looter? Or a terrorist?
What would stop the Federales labeling YOU a rioter?
How would you defend yourself?

"What will it be, Peace... or War?"

-Adolf Hitler, while forcing the Enabling Act of 1933 past the Reichstag.


That's my point! That is what you need to be concerned about.

Will you be deemed to be an "insurgent" or "enemy combatant" merely for protesting against your government?

I won't be, because I'm in the UK.

I entirely agree that these camps will be used in a civil unrest scenario. I get that. I don't dispute it.

But, the principal is that they SHOULD be used to detain truly dangerous people, those who will do harm to others for a few $.
They SHOULDN'T be used to detain protesters who wish to gather outside regional government offices and demand that their leaders stand down.

That is the point I am making here.
People need to really decide if these FEMA camps are such a bad idea.

Personally, they're only a bad idea if those being detained have done nothing to require it. That is why I say that this is what you need to focus on, not the fact that these camps exist, but who will they wish to put in them.


reply posted on 3-2-2009 @ 12:27 PM by detachedindividual
reply to post by mantic


I think they are designed for that use too, along with evacuation centres for civilians, secure compounds for FEMA staff and materials to deal with a situation, detention of rioters/looters, treatment of victims in an emergency...

They really are multipurpose sites.


reply posted on 3-2-2009 @ 01:47 PM by L.HAMILTON
reply to post by The Nighthawk
As far as Google goes , you might want to check a previous post of mine.....www.abovetopsecret.com...


reply posted on 3-2-2009 @ 11:18 PM by unknown known
reply to post by burdman30ott6


Why wouldnt you want to keep people from climbing out if they've been put their for a reason?


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 12:56 AM by cognoscente
reply to post by unknown known


Well that's what we are unsure of. The inwardly pointed barbed wire could be a measure to contain people, which pose a threat to society, as equally as it could be a way to keep undeserving political dissidents out of action. The point is, these camps wouldn't be built if it weren't for the anticipation of some large scale event. I just don't believe that people will be forced into camps if it were merely for purposes of protection from natural disaster, however large it may be, because in such a scenario it might be more prudent to spread people randomly over a larger geographical space than to place them in a situation where they are most vulnerable. More importantly, who would willingly subject themselves to containment in the naive belief that somehow they would be safer in cramped, box carts?

The configuration of the barbed wire would suggest that people in these camps might attempt to escape frequently. These camps could be used either for the detention of criminals in some apocalyptic scenario, or for the containment of political dissidents in some revolutionary uprising, or even for regular citizens should they appear to object, contradict or comprise the authoritarian direction of the ruling power. Either way, since the government is fully aware that these people will not be placed in these camps according to their will, it is increasingly more apparent that such camps will only assist in some totalitarian agenda. Whether this would be in our best interest, or that such an excuse would be made, is currently unknown.

Does government have the right to make such total contingency plans, regardless of the degree of catastrophe, without the express approval of its citizenry? According to members of this board, the concept itself is justly intolerable.

[edit on 4-2-2009 by cognoscente]


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 02:08 AM by burdman30ott6
Originally posted by unknown known
reply to post by burdman30ott6


Why wouldnt you want to keep people from climbing out if they've been put their for a reason?


That's why we have buildings called prisons in this country. If you break the law, you are sent to prison. What we're looking at where these so-called FEMA camps are concerned is the capacity to potentially detain hundreds of thousands if not millions of people. My concern is this, what does the government expect will happen that will mandate the required concentration and confinement of that many Americans?

It isn't even Constitutional to consider, in my opinion. What scenario would allow the government to Constitutionally incarcerate that many Americans with such a density of people being locked up that modified millitary bases surrounded by razor wire would be needed?

Unless people are breaking fair and justifiable laws, there is NO reason to "put them there" and it is furthermore highly illegal to even lock them up in the first place. By "fair and justifiable laws" I'm not talking about telling the government they suck or stockpiling Constitutionally protected firearms or questioning our supposedly elected overlords, either. Nor am I talking about defending yourself against tyrany.


reply posted on 5-3-2009 @ 08:54 AM by 38181
reply to post by burdman30ott6


Im thinking maybe the US is anticipating a large scale invasion from Mexico in the form of people fleeing their corupt country government and soon to be blood bath from cartels.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 7 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 8 days ago with 72 member flags
Renowned Geophysicist Says Strange Sky Sounds Are Real
  Posted 1 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 19 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 7 days ago with 49 member flags