Increasing Number of States Declaring Sovereignty
Posted by sakerfa on February 5, 2009
Back in December, the Wall Street Journal had a good chuckle over Russian academic Igor Panarin’s prediction that the United States would break
apart by 2010. Using threadbare Cold War logic, Andrew Osborn wrote that Panarin’s forecast “is music to the ears of the Kremlin, which in recent
years has blamed Washington for everything from instability in the Middle East to the global financial crisis.” For the WSL scribe, Panarin’s
analysis is about the Red Bear “returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the weakness of the 1990s, when many feared that the
country would go economically and politically bankrupt and break into separate territories.”
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights were nullified many years ago, at least since the emergence of the Federalists under Alexander Hamilton.
In fact, it was not so much “weakness” that destroyed Russia as it was the IMF, the World Bank, and Wall Street, in other words it was another
bankster looting and fire sale scheme that brought the former Soviet Union down, not that we should expect the Wall Street Journal to admit as much.
Ditto the current “global financial crisis” and instability in the Middle East.
“Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of
the dollar,” Osborn summarizes. “Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces — with Alaska
reverting to Russian control.”
In the case of a growing number of U.S. states, however, it is not so much economic decline and moral degradation pointing the way to a
“disintegration,” but rather violations of the Tenth Amendment. The Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill
of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791, and states restates the Constitution’s principle of Federalism by providing that powers not granted to
the national government nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the states and to the people. It is based on an earlier provision of the Articles
of Confederation: “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this
Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.”
Although Fox News and CNN are not telling you about it, a growing number of states are declaring sovereignty. Washington, New Hampshire, Arizona,
Montana, Michigan, Missouri, Oklahoma, California, and Georgia have all introduced bills and resolutions declaring sovereignty under the Tenth
Amendment. Colorado, Hawaii, Pennsylvania, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Alaska, Kansas, Alabama, Nevada, Maine, and Illinois are considering such
For details on the particular bills and resolutions introduced by the above states, check out the following:
Sadly, far too many Americans are woefully ignorant when it comes to understanding their rights and the Constitution. As Gary Alder notes in his “15
Key Principles of the Founding Fathers,” the “9th and 10th Amendments are the keystones to preserving Freedom.” In fact, the first 10
amendments, known as the Bill of (Individual) Rights, clarify the restraints placed on the national government and they safeguard the rights of
individuals. It does not take a rocket scientist to conclude that all of these individual rights are under withereing attack by the federal
“Obama’s plans for a federal handgun license, ‘hate crimes’ laws to regulate Christians’ speech about their own religious beliefs on
homosexuality, President Obama’s youth corps for mandatory public service and the so-called ‘Fairness Doctrine’ to ‘balance’ talk radio have
New Hampshire Lawmakers telling Obama to basically grow up and get some better ideas,” writes Jake Jones. “They say that if Obama’s plans are
implimented, it would constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States.”
Unfortunately, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were nullified many years ago, at least since the emergence of the Federalists under Alexander
Hamilton, as Thomas J. DiLorenzo persausively argues. “Federalists like Joseph Story and John Marshall, and later Whig politicians like Daniel
Webster and Abraham Lincoln… would tell The Big Lie that the Constitution was ratified by ‘the whole people’ and not as it actually was – by
the citizens of the sovereign states, with their representatives assembled in state conventions,” writes DiLorenzo. In the years since, the reach
and severity of federalism has grown expotentially. “The U.S. government is now characterized by dictatorial power, abuse of every kind of personal
liberty, confiscatory taxation, economic fascism, dangerous militarism, and imperialism.” New World Order minion Obama will take this dictatorial
power to new heights under the pretense of saving the people from the bankster engineered global economic depression.
As Obama and Congress further extend the dictatorial reach of the federal government — under the control of a small cotorie of globalists and
international bankers — we can expect more states to assert their rights under the Constitution and the Tenth Amendment.
gore part 1
[Note, importantly that Beck is not aware that the Hippie generation was designed by the Travistock Think tank setting up the rebellious generation
yet to come. Beck is clueless as to the big agenda. I'm not sure of his real loyalty or if he is just clueless. Again, I repeat Beck is NOT
AWARE or pretending to not be aware of the truth he runs his mouth too much here, besides being totally clueless. Focus on the speech mostly.
Reflect to the 911 attack planned by the American and European Illuminati…….here is just one of the reasons………….Patriot Act and John
Warner national Defense authorization Act to be able to declare martial law.
FROM LISA………. The definition of "a terrorist" as defined by The Patriot Act, HR 3162, 107th Congress
See the red highlighted area below:
"HR 3162 RDS
H. R. 3162
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
October 24, 2001
SEC. 802. DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM.
(a) DOMESTIC TERRORISM DEFINED- Section 2331 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1)(B)(iii), by striking `by assassination or kidnapping' and inserting `by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping';
(2) in paragraph (3), by striking `and';
(3) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and inserting `; and'; and
(4) by adding at the end the following:
`(5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities that--
`(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
`(B) appear to be intended--
`(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
`(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or
`(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
`(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.'.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Section 3077(1) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
`(1) `act of terrorism' means an act of domestic or international terrorism as defined in section 2331;'."
I've highlighted the definition of "a terrorist", and as anyone can plainly see, any type of social or political activist now qualifies as "a
Google H.R. 645….see how it fits?
NOTE: From Chris, a good friend he sends this drama they are setting up…………….CIA bees are busy busy busy…..
Mexican authorities say 90 percent of smuggled weapons come from the United States.
MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS ARMED TO THE HILT, THREATENING NATIONAL SECURITY
Wednesday, February 04, 2009
This is modern Mexico, where the leaders of the powerful drug cartels are armed to the teeth with sophisticated weapons, many of which are smuggled
over the border from the United States. It is with this array of superior weapons that drug cartels are threatening the very stability of their own
country. And it's why America's outgoing CIA Director, Michael Hayden, says violence in Mexico will pose the second greatest threat to U.S. security
next year, right after Al Qaeda.
"Americans are understandably focused on the flow of drugs and migrants into the U.S. from Mexico," says Andreas Peter, author of "Border Games:
Policing the U.S.-Mexico Divide."
"But too often glossed over in the border security debate is the flow of weapons across the border into Mexico," he told Foxnews.com in a statement
via the Internet.
The cartels are obtaining arms from America by using "straw man" buyers, who legally purchase weapons at gun shops and gun shows in the U.S. The
weapons cross into Mexico, where border security is much weaker heading south of the border than it is going north.
NOTE: "straw man" buyers???? Don’t they mean CIA or contracted CIA suppliers. Drug issues….wrong. They are getting Mexico ready to be a major
distraction and will bleed into the US. Getting us all ready for the North American Union.