When this story originally came out the news said that the plane had landed with 5 bombs. At that point being that I had worked with military aircraft
for 8 years I began to wonder how that was possible. One of these weapons weigh a lot and the off balanced load would seem to make take-off like that
impossible as when the aircraft left the ground the heavy wing would immediately hit the ground causing a crash (there is a job that specifically
deals with this called a load master). Landing would be somewhat easier as after the aircraft was airborne it could be trimmed to compensate for this
off balanced condition; however, at takeoff it would be unknown how much trim was needed and I am uncertain if it could even safely take off if it
were known as the trim would seem to effect the aircraft before it left the ground due to the airflow across the trimmed surface thus forcing the
light wing into the ground at takeoff.
Could it be possible that the original story was correct and that they dropped one to be picked up by a third party, and then landed with only 5?
There was a concern over a missing warhead for about 2 days then nothing further was ever mentioned.
If my memory serves me correctly, I responded to a post on this here on ATS when the story first came out.
Here is a link to one of the stories about this:
formerspook.blogspot.com...
Now the new stories are saying it had 6 nukes which is what I would expect due to the imbalanced load, I wonder which story is right?
Did it take off with 6 and drop one, or did it take off and land with 6, or did it somehow manage to take off with only 5?
[edit on 2/2/2009 by DarrylGalasso]