posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 09:23 AM
reply to post by crmanager
So what are you suggesting? That the Israeli response was a good one? That it was any better than those who used these human shields?
...Or are you suggesting that Israeli life is more valuable than Palestinian life? Worth anything from 80 to 200 Palestinian civilians for each
Israel had the technology, the opportunity and the capability to limit civilian casualties. They decided not to. In some cases, it appears they may
have decided to even be extra careless.
The unbiased, moral, and simple question would be: How many innocents have to die? Or even better, Do they have to die at all? Anything other than
that is showing bias.
Originally posted by crmanager
Just them JEWS shootin civilians.
The open anti-jewish sentiment is staggering.
You do realise that you are the first person in this thread to talk about jews shooting civilians? This is hilarious! You must be so extremely biased
that you can't even see it yourself!
I ask you to answer these question, please, honestly. Answer it to yourself if you don't feel like posting it on this board:
"Can Israel do no wrong? Why?"
"Is everyone who is against Israel evil?"
"Is everyone who is against Israel a....heh....jew-hater?"
[edit on 2-2-2009 by babloyi]