It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blueorder
Originally posted by Master Shen long
although she didnt "accidentally" decide to vandalise someone's wall did she....
I wasnt on about her i was on about Europe considering he/she may 1 day accidently break the law (im presuming by the poster attitude the claim they never do/have). Its sods law everyone on the planet will break the law at some point, Intentional or not..... Myself and you included.
Originally posted by becomingaware
If I come off hostile I'm sorry. I had a friend that was a graffitti artist. He was arrested for doing a "legal mural". The owner of the store was at lunch and couldn't tell the police officer that it was commisioned.
He was beaten to death before he could go to court by an inmate that was there for armed robbery. It was over a chess game. I'll see if I can find the newspaper artice.
The state ended up compensating his family. The police officer wasn't fired.
[edit on 2-2-2009 by becomingaware]
Originally posted by Kryties
The only person I see getting worked up here is you, I am serious. Most of the other posters seem to be rational, critical thinkers who deduce that 3 months jail for a first time offender is rather a large payment for the crime.
They are being compassionate to the girl because she did not deserve that harsh a treatment, ESPECIALLY as it was a first time offense.
You even tried to accuse ME of being hysterical, which in a way I was: Hysterical with laughter at your accusation
[edit on 2/2/2009 by Kryties]
Originally posted by Master Shen long
I wasnt on about her i was on about Europe considering he/she may 1 day accidently break the law (im presuming by the poster attitude the claim they never do/have). Its sods law everyone on the planet will break the law at some point, Intentional or not..... Myself and you included.
Originally posted by alyosha1981
Good for them! I think if judges were this harsh on kids convicted of their first crimes, they'd think twice befire re offending.
Originally posted by shortywarn
Originally posted by alyosha1981
Good for them! I think if judges were this harsh on kids convicted of their first crimes, they'd think twice befire re offending.
yes,,,but think of the cost of housing her for 3 months
would not community service have been better
that would cost tax payers zero dollars
and maybe some benefit to the community, she could pickup litter,,,do clean up etc etc
kind of stupid if you ask me
and i think having to do 100 hours of community service is worse than sitting on your butt in jail
Originally posted by alyosha1981
reply to post by tezzajw
Your right she should have to pay the $200, and do the jail time and then go appoligise to to the store owner as well!
Originally posted by sensfan
You do the crime, you do the time.
An old saying, but it's the truth. This woman is not a kid. 18 year olds know better than that. Jeez, at 18 I was in my 2nd year of college and living on my own...wouldn't have even though about graffiti.
I can't believe that there are people out there defending her and saying she shouldn't have gotten the 3 months. She did something illegal, so should pay for it. Laws are laws...obey them or suffer the consequences.