It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is your opinion that it is disproportionate. If you read my post. I agree. I also point out why these laws have come about. Where were your posts when the laws were tabled. Nowhere. Where was your protest at the tabling of these laws last year. No where. When did you question the passing of these laws. Never. When did you offer a discussion or provide an alternative to combat this huge drain on public and private resources, funds and man power. Zilch.
Originally posted by tezzajw
Of course it is the law's fault that she's been sentenced to jail. There's no question that she drew on the wall. However, the disproportionate sentence is a DIRECT result of the absurd laws in place.
Please read the current laws. Look at the pre-existing laws up to 18 years and look at the changes to penalties under the new act. She recieved well under the minimum. This is the law being enforced as per public policy as a result of ongoing cost incurred to the vast majority of law abiders. I said the courts are as harsh as they are compassionate. In this cash, it is harsh, i clearly say this a number of times in my post. Please read my posts properly.
All of the above applies to a three month jail term for writing on a wall, does it?
look at your posts. They will provide you with a great example of knee-jerk over reactions.
I'd sure hate to see what a knee jerk over-reaction is...
Once again I cleary point out that that is exactly what the court has done. It no longer tolerates this behaviour, not favours any individual of any history the grace of tolerance, compassion. I clearly point this out in my posts. Please read posts properly.
You got that right. A three month jail sentence does show lack of compassion.
Please read my posts. I say that harsh penalties will be sentenced, and then the lesser penalties which i link below the stetement will apply, these are the same laws that already existed and pre-exist the new changes. Please read the laws, and my posts. Your replies are emotive, ridiculous and feature no regard for the people that these laws are designed to protect ie those tha OBEY the law. There is a simple solution. Do Not Graffiti. Unfortunately Terra, people do not follow this simple to understand request. And we end up here, penalising people severly due to the cost we as a whole incur as a direct result of this behaviour.
So it's not a police state, but we're going to see the full force of the law and harsher penalties smacking down on teenagers with textas. Ah-huh.
I agree, imagine that after three years and millions of dollars, and countless hours of hard work that people still do not give a #$%^ about other peoples property whilst only satisfying there own need to write there name on a wall in texta.
We've got to make sure that everyone feels safe, don't we? What a way to educate the public!
Originally posted by PullThePin
reply to post by bloodcircle
Yeah, "" people because of how they choose to live.
There is nothing wrong with saying "# the law." The law has #ed over plenty of innocent people, a good example is the ridiculous war on drugs. Arresting innocent, non violent people for smoking a bit of grass or dropping some acid.
So I say # the law too.
Originally posted by PullThePin
reply to post by bloodcircle
Yay! Let's judge people we don't know based off pictures they took with their friends that are probably meant to be seen only by their friends.
[edit on 2-2-2009 by PullThePin]
Originally posted by Master Shen long
Ok man, How many examples do you want me to send you? I have a large LARGE list of injustice cases bookmarked on my p.c..... Like the 11 yo taserd in school, Or the guy in NYC who had a police baton shoved up his ass in the tube station in front of witnesess, Or how about the 80 yo guy jailed for 4 years for riding his bike on his own garden drunk? Or maybe the black dude taserd to death for fainting in court? Do you want them all?
Originally posted by bloodcircle
reply to post by Kryties
Indeed...
Charming
Uhhh... WTF
Anyone who thinks she and her 'gang' have not done this many times before, are fooling themselves.
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
Where has common sense gone.
Graffiti artist gets good behaviour bond
February 3, 2009, 3:29 pm
A graphic design student caught doing graffiti on a Sydney wall has been wished luck in his art career by a magistrate, so long as his work is exhibited in galleries and not on public property.
Edward Mulvihill, 20, of Thirroul, near Wollongong, escaped with a good behaviour bond on Tuesday, a day after a teenager was jailed for three months for writing graffiti on a Sydney cafe's wall.
Mulvihill appeared before Waverley Local Court, pleading guilty to a charge of malicious damage after vandalising a wooden wall on Oxford Street, Paddington, on December 16.
Magistrate Chris Longley castigated Mulvihill, saying "it was all too prevalent for people in the community to create eyesores for the public at large".