Killary Clinton’s Emphasis on Diplomacy?
In A Recent Interview with Noam Chomsky by Press TV, we are shockingly reminded of what might be the true nature of Secretary Clinton’s direction
with regard to Iran:
Press TV: Robert Gates and Admiral [Mike] Mullen have been talking about the 16-month time line for withdrawal from Iraq is just one of the options, a
slight difference from what Obama has been saying in the campaign. And, Hillary Clinton famously said she was prepared to obliterate all of Iran and
kill 70 million citizens. On Iraq and Iran what do you see as changes?
Chomsky: What happened in Iraq is extremely interesting and important. The few correspondents with real experience any whom know something have
understood it. Patrick Cockburn, Jonathan Steele and one or two others.
What has happened is that there was a remarkable campaign of non-violent resistance in Iraq, which compelled the United States, step-by-step, to back
away from its programs and its goals. They compelled the US occupying forces to allow an election, which the US did not want and tried to evade in all
sorts of ways.
Then they went on from there to force the United States to accept at least formally a status of forces agreement, which if the Obama administration
lives up to it, will abandon most of the US war aims. It will eliminate the huge permanent military bases that the US has built in Iraq. It will mean
the US will not control decisions over how the oil resources will be accessed and used. And in fact just every war aim is gone.
Of course there is a question of whether the US will live up to it and what you are reporting is among the serious indications that they are trying to
evade living up to it. But what happened there is really significant, and a real credit to the people of Iraq, who have suffered miserably. I mean,
the country has been absolutely destroyed, but they did manage to get the US to back away formally from its major war aims.
In the case of Iran, Obama's statements have not been as inflammatory as Clinton's, but they amount to pretty much the same thing. He said all
options are open. Well, what does all options mean? Presumably that includes nuclear war, you know, that is an option.
There is no indication that he is willing to take the steps, say, that the American population wants. An overwhelming majority of the American
population for years has been in favor, has agreed with the Non-Aligned Movement, that Iran should have the rights granted to the signers of the
non-proliferation treaty, in fact to develop nuclear energy.
It should not have the right to develop nuclear weapons, and more interestingly about the same percentages, about 75 to 80%, call for the
establishment of a nuclear weapons free zone in the region, which would include Iran, Israel, and any US forces deployment there, within all kinds of
verifications and so on.
That could eliminate probably one of the major sources of the conflict. There is no indication that the Obama administration has any thought of doing
anything about this.
For more information about this important interview, please visit this site: