Israel to launch war against Iran within a month , page 4


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 07:18 PM by dooper
reply to post by munkey66



One reason it's hard to stop the rockets from being fired over a wall is because the clowns that launch these things hide and often fire from school yards, outside markets, just outside apartment buildings, behind businesses, and anywhere that civilians are around to help conceal them.

So when a counterstrike is made, sometimes, even children are hit. This is a calculated move by Hamas launchers. The more civilians that are killed, the more propaganda they get to generate.

That Gaza land you're referring to, suggesting Israel wants it? It's been conquered and given back twice.

Some quest for land, huh?

And many of those civilians? Non-uniformed Hamas combatants in civilian clothes.

And whose fault is that?

I would love for you to show me a regional military that could beat Israel. Just one.

Already, a coalition of Lebanon, Syria, Transjordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and a large Palestinian guerilla force ganged up on that tiny nation, and got their collective asses kicked.

Another time, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria lined up masses of men and equipment again against this tiny country, and got an even bigger ass whipping.

The last time, Jordan opted out, and little Israel, though attacked again with superior numbers and forces, kicked the living dookey out of their attackers.

Please.

Name a regional country that could whip Israel.

'Cause it sure as hell won't be anything Arabic.


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 07:21 PM by deccal
Originally posted by dooper
reply to
post by munkey66



I would love for you to show me a regional military that could beat Israel. Just one.



Turkey owns Israel in 5 days.



reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 07:28 PM by deccal
Originally posted by dooper
reply to
post by deccal



In your dreams.

Only in your dreams.


This is another topic, but I recommend you to compare war experience, war culture and army equipment of both. Actually, they are allies now, for now though.


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 07:42 PM by dooper
reply to post by deccal


Think about it.

Turkey would have to come down corridors and through Syria and/or Lebanon.

To do so is to follow easily anticipated lines of approach.

They may, MAY reach the Israeli border with a third of whatever they started with.

That's the thing about an anticipated line of approach. It's anticipated.

And every step of the way is full of deadly dangers.

Large, powerful formations is just a concentration to be pounded.

Smaller formations are easily segmented and overwhelmed.

Now.

Come up with a real threat.


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 08:06 PM by munkey66
Originally posted by dooper
reply to
post by munkey66



One reason it's hard to stop the rockets from being fired over a wall is because the clowns that launch these things hide and often fire from school yards, outside markets, just outside apartment buildings, behind businesses, and anywhere that civilians are around to help conceal them.


So don't you think Iran will use a similar tactic or do you think they are going to have the rocket launchers just sitting there with big signs on them saying "Don't shoot here"?
Your enemy is currently in Iran according to Israel, but what would happen if Israel struck a blow against Iran.

1. US war ships are now a target
2. US soldiers are now open to being attacked by Iranians in Iraq, afghanistan.
3. Syria, lebanon and Jordon could possible attack Isael (of course unless they are paid off big time from an anonomous source)
4. Gulf of Oman will be closed
5. fuel prices sky rocket
6 civillian unrest in oil dependent countries
7. escelation of conflict around the world.

Of course this is just a possibility, it may or may not pan out that way.

But I really think you hold a little to much faith in your unwavering belief that Israels armed forces are superior to everyone elses.

no matter how much technology a country has, you always have to factor in variables.
A suicide bomber will not be grounded due to bad wheather
A home based army isn't concerned with supply lines to the front.

Drop as many bombs on an area and you will still get survivers who will do everything in their power to destroy you.

Hitler tried to exterminate the jews and didn't succeed and now they are very powerful indeed.
What do you think the world would have in store for Israel if they went down this road?


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 08:56 PM by dooper
reply to post by munkey66



To fire upon a US Navy ship would be a disaster for Iran. Whether it hit or missed, the US Navy would begin to deconstruct Iran. And you can bet that a lot of targets in Iran have already been selected.

The other suppositions border on the ludicrous.

The day the US begins getting hit with Iranian suicide bombers, the Iranian people will begin to cease existence.

The last people that pissed off America haven't done too well. And that would infuriate us as a nation.


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 09:05 PM by munkey66
reply to post by dooper



Who where the last ones to piss off the Americans?

Saudi Arabia?
Oh no wait! they apparently where doing a job for a guy in a cave in Afghanistan who had links to Suddam.

You may say that the US will go after whoever upsets them, but that is the whole idea.
The US is going to crumble when its military crumbles.

Without sounding to much like a conspiracy nut, but the US fleet is just sitting there waiting for the next Pearl harbour.

Everything that has happened and is going to happen is because of design.

Israel attacking Gaza qas by design
if not, why where Israeli troops practicing for months prior to the attack?

Iran will be attacked at the right time and not one minute before the people in charge give the orders.
The real people in charge and not the puppets.


reply posted on 4-2-2009 @ 11:28 PM by dooper
reply to post by munkey66



The countries that pissed us off and quickly learned of pissed off Americans know who they are.

Funny you mentioned Pearl Harbor.

In 1945, we only had two of the good stuff.

Coincidentally, two cities smoked.

We have more than two now, I assure you.


reply posted on 5-2-2009 @ 12:51 AM by munkey66
reply to post by dooper


Hmmm the way you describe the bombing of 2 cities with nukes as getting smiked really makes me wonder.

Dropping Nukes on countries is not the answer, nukes where meant to be a deterent.
and we can see how much of a deterent they have been, Hamas still fires rockets on a Israel.
America was attacked on 9/11, another nuclear country.
The bomb blast in India, another nuclear country.

Just because you have nukes does not make you imune to being attacked.

Do you think that Israel is worried more about Iran getting a nuke because it will lose its power grip on the ME.
Because we know who ever fires the first one will be condenmed by the rest of the world.
What would Iran gain from Nuking Israel?


reply posted on 5-2-2009 @ 01:12 AM by mazzroth
Originally posted by dooper
reply to
post by munkey66



The countries that pissed us off and quickly learned of pissed off Americans know who they are.

Funny you mentioned Pearl Harbor.

In 1945, we only had two of the good stuff.

Coincidentally, two cities smoked.

We have more than two now, I assure you.


So if using your logic if the USA pisses off say Paraguay by stealing all of its resources its only fair that they retaliate ?


reply posted on 5-2-2009 @ 02:28 AM by invisibleman11
reply to post by mmiichael



good post. no need to slam my typing-challenged hands in the door


reply posted on 5-2-2009 @ 04:47 PM by rationaluser
Originally posted by dooper
reply to
post by munkey66



The countries that pissed us off and quickly learned of pissed off Americans know who they are.

Funny you mentioned Pearl Harbor.

In 1945, we only had two of the good stuff.

Coincidentally, two cities smoked.

We have more than two now, I assure you.


dooper you are the most arrogant blood thirsty impatient offensive right-wing propagandists i have ever met ( or a really good troll) and i've been on 4chan today...ah israel is that the country that always manages to underestimate its opponent and get its soldiers killed or is that the country that acts tough because it has such a large "army" for want of a better word i can't think what else you would call a country that called its civilians "soldiers" no army is to good er word for the IDF it throws its weight around like a fat fu** on a treadmill doing whatever the fu** it wants and let me assure YOU dooper if it was irans weapons vs israels weapons iran would win you know why ISRAEL JETS ARE NEXT TO FUC*** USELESS they get all there jets from the us the only tank they "pride themselves on" is the merkava 5 and we all saw how 75 of those "superior tanks with reactive armour" got owned by 1970's soviet era anti tank wire guided missiles and iran has plenty of them not to mention hezbollah's (NOT EVEN IRAN FFS HEZ BO FUC*** LAH) ambush's that killed a dozen soldiers each time.

TLR learn to anti propaganda and i'll chuck in one of murphys law for lols
"if the attacks going well it's an ambush"
thats what israil
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel Uses a 13 Year Old Boy as a Human Shield
  Posted 15 days ago with 38 member flags
The Most Outrageous Hateful Rhetoric of All Time
  Posted 16 days ago with 37 member flags
US Preparing for a Post-Israel Middle East?
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags
Iran Bashing, Terrorism and Who Chose The Chosen People, Anyway?
  Posted 16 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

My rant about my country.... England
  Rant: 8 hours ago, 46 replies
PROOF 9/11/01 was an inside job
  9/11 Conspiracies: 17 hours ago, 35 replies
I have a new Kitten....
  General Chit Chat: 17 hours ago, 26 replies