It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mystiq
reply to post by Illusionsaregrander
The point is, that women do not have the ability to chose the number of children they have, short of the moment they get fixed, as birth control options are not efficient and even dangerous for most of them. [edit on 1-2-2009 by mystiq]
Originally posted by FinalSonicX
population control is not moral, in my opinion.
no one has the right to determine how many children an individual or couple may have unless having those children infringes on our rights in some way.
Originally posted by Illusionsaregrander
reply to post by mystiq
Edward O Wilson, the famed biologist, has noted that everywhere in the world women have had the personal freedom to choose, (including the freedom from religious oppression) AND have also had access to birth control birth rates have fallen to around 2.5 children per woman. When women ARE given freedom, and education, and access to birth control, as inadequate and messy as it currently is, large numbers of women are choosing NOT to be mindless breeders and carers of children.
Originally posted by Aeons
You want the most fertile to undergo chemical or abdomenal surgery to promote your cause.
You LITERALLY want to cut into the bodies of fertile women to control your society.