It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA photograph pyramid on moon.

page: 5
47
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 01:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by socrates271

Originally posted by trusername

Originally posted by socrates271
Just a few images of Earth pyramids from space.









wow this really shows how this is 8 sided and not 4 sided doesn't it.

well 9 sided if you count the base and if that's flat.




[edit on 2/1/2009 by trusername]


well since there's no cap stone let's make it 10.


Looks to perfect to be made by an ancient people... its perfectly aligned on all sides...

the moon pic was taken from ground level, this is a sky view. how could we compare if its two different angles?




posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 01:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by RFBurns
reply to post by HunkaHunka
 


Here is a cut from the 3 strip original of that IRSO pyramid..or so called pyramid.

Source is HERE



The cropped image with the pyramid icon uses the sub sampled TMC strip, which is basically just a b/w strip. The RGB strip and the IRRG strip shows better clarity, obvious reason why only the b/w would be used...dont ya think?
Cheers!!!!


I've been here before........

If you look at the SHADOWS you will notice that the "pyramid" is actually a DEPRESSION and not a structure....unless all those craters are DOMES too!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

nothing personall RF my friend, just quoted for the pics.

NO pyramid but a HOLE in the surface.

Cheers..nerb



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 01:55 PM
link   
reply to post by nerbot
 


Exactly. Thats why the author of that comparison image with a close up highly blurred b/w image thinks there is a pyramid there, when clearly anyone can see from the RGB and IRRG strips, its not any pyramid of any sort.


Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 01:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by badmedia
Well, I have watched this thread with an open mind, and I think RF makes the most sense as far as the pyramid does.

But ummm, that little clip where the flag moves as the guy walks by...


Thank you.

As to the flag moving as the guy walks by it, I believe that was discussed on another thread and was seen on two camera angles, and one of the camera angles shows the astronaut barely touches the edge of the flag, making it move as he walked by.



Cheers!!!!

[edit on 1-2-2009 by RFBurns]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by RFBurns
 


Yeah dude, I sick of these threads....


If people would spend 30 seconds considering what they are posting we wouldn't have to repeat ourselves so much.

Take care Burns.....I like your style and despite our brief initial encounters, I think we're on the same side....


Cheers



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by ziggystar60
Here is the image AS17-135-20689, with the "pyramid". The photo is interesting:



Link to photo at Apollo 17 Lunar Surface Journal:
www.hq.nasa.gov...


I have seen dozen's of photo's, too many, where people see faces, etc., and, although, I would love for them to be true, I point out things which are painfully obvious to me.

Many times people see patterns, which are just that, patterns, nothing more. And, therefore, not likely to be what is patterned. When it comes to pyramidal forms, the first ond only thing I ever bother to point out are the obvious curvatures and bumps, which, since the objects are filmed from a distance, tell me, that, if I landed and stood near it, It would look nothing like the pyramid it seems to be from a distance, and, not likely to be a deliberate structure.

Your picture, I must admit, I've not seen before. However, It is not curved or bowed or arced, and appears to not have bumps or inconsitencies. There is a miscule bump,or curvature, to the left side mid- way down which can be made out through the fog, but, given the overall structure, I would say that if I stood directly before it, that it would have all the features I would expect a deliberate straight edge pyramid to look like. The bump could be a statue or a platforn, or a mid point entrance, etc. Or, something beyond the structure just obscured by the fog. With or without the bump that I can make out, and maybe only I see it, I would say, either this is a doctored picture from Egypt, etc. of an actual pyramid passed off as a moonscape. Or, it is a doctored picture of the moon. Or, it is the photo of an actual pyramid on the moon, whether man made or ET in origin.

Has anyone evr done computer matching of all the moon pics by measuring known features, and putting all the pic's in a 1:1 ratio that way, and then measuring prominent and less prominant features and distances, to determine if they are reacreations or similiar models having minute or major size, shape, and structural differences, using the landmark features to accurately guage their ratio's to one another.

That would scientifically prove whether we are being lied to about moon images. Same for the other space images. i'd do it, but, I'm not the number crunching type of person to do it.

But, here, Houston, We have a Pyramid!

[edit on 1-2-2009 by PhyberDragon]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 02:33 PM
link   
reply to post by RFBurns
 



RFBurns!!! I'm with you!!! I remember Hoagland's discussions on this photo so i checked it out on the nasa photo archive site. I'm sure it's just part of other machinery on the lunar module. It's rather wrong of Hoagland and others to even push this image as evidence of a 'pyramid structure'. Although it deserves creation of this thread!



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 02:41 PM
link   
The question here is. We here at ATS know of all the coverups that protect our race from what most people have been brainwashed to believe, that God isn't out there . Satan is out there. But logical minds are growing and brainwashing is gradually subsideing. Within 10 years will know the truth about where we came from and what lies ahead for us. These identified beings are most likely are orginal makers in some way. They are not a threat but BIG BROTHER that we are most known to believe as the government. I BELIEVE.



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 03:08 PM
link   
reply to post by riggs2099
 



So you are basically saying that Nasa and the US government actually worry about what people think and that they would go to such great lengths and hide objects that only APPEAR to be earthly objects? but in reality are just rock formations as you say. As opposed to hiding objects with similar characteristics from the masses and so that Russia, China, or India do not start their own little moon voyage to uncover the real truths and to prove to the world that the United States government is the biggest liar of them all. Which do you think seems to be more of a reality?



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 03:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by bicnarok
Whats the point of posting this original black and white photo in different colours? What´s next, is someone add green and red to it so we can see it with 3d glasses.
I probably should have included some description. The first image is the original high quality posted in this thread.

The second image has had no more image processing than the manipulation of the color levels to enhance white-to-black contrast.

The third image has a noise reduction pass applied. This is a non-standard noise reduction in that the image is slightly pixelated and then aggregated with the original image. This is a method I developed myself and is always being fine tuned, however you can see that it preserves much of the original image data while removing a significant amount of noise. It's not something that can be applied to all photos but it was perfect in this case.

The fourth photo, the one with the red coloration, is a technique I use because of my unreliable eyesight. The brain has an odd way of interpreting visual information. It's been my experience that when looking at degraded or extreme zoom images that details sometimes stand out better when the HSL levels are altered.

Arm-chair image analysis is a tricky thing, which I think this thread proves above all else.

If you monkey about too much with the processing you can see anything you want. There comes a point when the application of image filters creates more artifacts than it eliminates.

The trick is knowing when to stop.



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by nerbot

Originally posted by RFBurns
reply to post by HunkaHunka
 


Here is a cut from the 3 strip original of that IRSO pyramid..or so called pyramid.

Source is HERE



The cropped image with the pyramid icon uses the sub sampled TMC strip, which is basically just a b/w strip. The RGB strip and the IRRG strip shows better clarity, obvious reason why only the b/w would be used...dont ya think?
Cheers!!!!


I've been here before........

If you look at the SHADOWS you will notice that the "pyramid" is actually a DEPRESSION and not a structure....unless all those craters are DOMES too!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

nothing personall RF my friend, just quoted for the pics.

NO pyramid but a HOLE in the surface.

Cheers..nerb


Its more like a ramp than a pyramid, maybe there´s motorcycle stunt men on the moon.

And those holes are not buildings, you can see the shadows from other objects.

Im surprised no one´s posted this picture and video yet.






[edit on 1-2-2009 by bicnarok]

[edit on 1-2-2009 by bicnarok]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 03:36 PM
link   
Looks also like a Tardis or marble arch like structure but is in fact the clavius crater caught in an odd angle so it looks like something, our minds make pictures out of things which arn´t there.






[edit on 1-2-2009 by bicnarok]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 03:50 PM
link   


enhancement:



[edit on 1/2/09 by YourForever]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 04:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by YourForever



enhancement:



[edit on 1/2/09 by YourForever]



Already seen that.

What you trying to say.?



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 04:04 PM
link   
This video is a stretch! There are average citizens out there with very powerful telescopes. Why is this not seen by them?



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 04:04 PM
link   
Why I think that photo does not show a pyramid or even a pyramid shaped mountain.

1. The photo was taken on the surface, there is no doubt about it.

2. It's the last photo from magazine 135/G according to the Lunar Surface Journal or the first from magazine 136/H, according to the Photo Index available on the Lunar Surface Journal.

3. The photos before show the seats and the floor of the LRV, photos taken by Jack Schmitt before he changed the magazine, just to finish it.

AS17-135-20678


AS17-135-20679


4. The first photo (available) after the "pyramid" photo also shows the LRV.

AS17-135-20682


5. There are other photos taken in similar circumstances, both at the end and the beginning of the magazines.

AS17-138-21181

AS17-138-21182

AS17-141-21665

AS17-141-21666

AS17-141-21667

AS17-142-21669

AS17-142-21670


6. Nothing around that area looks like a pyramid, as we can see in this panorama (sorry for the bad quality of the panorama, I had to make one myself and I did not had the time of making a good panorama).

(Click for full size)

7. Nothing looking like a pyramid was ever seen or photographed (as far as I know) in that area.



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 04:06 PM
link   



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 04:10 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


Have you read the earlier pages of the thread ArMaP? I noted all these facts about the previous and post images of 20680, the mission notes that the film magazine had just been changed.

Nice work putting the pan together tho.


Cheers!!!!



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 04:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by PhyberDragon
Your picture, I must admit, I've not seen before. However, It is not curved or bowed or arced, and appears to not have bumps or inconsitencies. There is a miscule bump,or curvature, to the left side mid- way down which can be made out through the fog, but, given the overall structure, I would say that if I stood directly before it, that it would have all the features I would expect a deliberate straight edge pyramid to look like.


Phyberdragon,thanks for the reply,it could just be a pixel but there does appear to be a right angle jutting out of the left side:


[edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 04:11 PM
link   
reply to post by RFBurns
 


Yes, I have read all the thread, my post was more to get all things in one place.



new topics

top topics



 
47
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join