Alright my first post on this was probably off a bit. I found some really interesting stuff. Check out a sample.
A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
In 1913, prior to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act President Wilson's The New Freedom was published, in which he revealed:
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the field of commerce
and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so
interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
On November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt wrote a letter to Col. Edward Mandell House, President Woodrow Wilson's close advisor:
"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of
Andrew Jackson... "
That there is such a thing as a cabal of power brokers who control government behind the scenes has been detailed several times in this century by
credible sources. Professor Carroll Quigley was Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University. President Clinton has publicly paid homage to the
influence Professor Quigley had on his life. In Quigley's magnum opus Tragedy and Hope (1966), he states:
"There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international ... network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical right
believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the
Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was
permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for
much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies... but in
general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."
I'll provide the link for where I found it if you are interested. I thought of something though as I looked up some stuff. If the organization has
its hands in everything and are as persuasive as people charge then surely they had their hands in the development of the internet. Information can
be changed and that information can be verified to be true by changing the information for where you get it and so on. So as to alter even historical
information. I may be way to freaked out, which I probably am. I gotta stop taking this stuff too seriously. Anyway here is the link hope it
helps.
www.constitution.org...