It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Congress Seeks To Authorize & Legalize FEMA Camp Facilities

page: 19
176
<< 16  17  18    20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 31 2009 @ 09:40 AM
link   
reply to post by zysin5
 



I have never seen that vid before, so my first question is..... how can it be confirmed that was actually FEMA saying those things?

If it really WAS a FEMA meeting - then something is more than JUST desperatly WRONG!

Where is confirmation that was FEMA, it could have been just some people "creating" a FEMA meeting.




posted on Jan, 31 2009 @ 12:00 PM
link   
Brothers and Sisters,

These FEMA camps as people continue calling them, are beginning to form. I live near a military establishment and my father works there, not that he is on their side. He actually wants to quit because he sees things that no red blooded American would want to happen, let alone allow it to. If you haven't heard by now I will tell you, there is Govt legislation that states the US as well as the rest of the world must disarm. There is no time frame specified, but it does say that the Military will disband. The reason for this is because the govts of the world believe peace is possible through disarmament, which it is not. Anyway, the first camps are going to begin coming up by the end of '09 and the rest will be shortly after. It makes sense if you want to remove those people who cause problems to build the camps, people who panic will go straight to them feeling "safe" because the govt says they will protect them. It is easier to make a cow want to go to slaughter than to make them. Remember this, you do not have to go, you can stand up and speak out against it. Simply call your representative and tell them that if they vote for it that you will not vote for them. Enough people call and they will vote against it. Also if you feel that your safety is an issue, there are people out there that are preparing to take in those in fear, and those who panic. Check this out www.youtube.com... Some would consider these folks oddballs and wierdo, but if you think about what their doing it makes sense because the stuff is fixing to hit the fan. If you want more information on other organizations please don't hesitate to email me Dotwr001@aol.com, it is time that someone stepped up and said no, that they are going to sit back and let these things happen. Email me, I can give you more info dotwr001@aol.com



posted on Jan, 31 2009 @ 12:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by questioningall
reply to post by zysin5
 

I have never seen that vid before, so my first question is..... how can it be confirmed that was actually FEMA saying those things?


That very thing crossed my mind. I happen to put a little bit to much trust in the person who posted that video on youtube..
Granted it could be a sham or progaganda. Hence I wanted to make it clear I do not intentionally post lies or other things that will mislead others into a doom and gloom setting..
I will look into this further today as I have some time to do so..
IF this ends up being a hoax or fabricated.. I will be the first person to recant what was said.. And offer up an agology if I am wrong, or posted something that was not true..
It was late last night when I posted that.. And didnt have time to validate that source.. So will look into that today for you..


[edit on 31-1-2009 by zysin5]



posted on Jan, 31 2009 @ 01:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dotwr001
Brothers and Sisters,

These FEMA camps as people continue calling them, are beginning to form. I live near a military establishment and my father works there, not that he is on their side. He actually wants to quit because he sees things that no red blooded American would want to happen, let alone allow it to.

Then why doesn't he become a whistle blower and help people?


If you haven't heard by now I will tell you, there is Govt legislation that states the US as well as the rest of the world must disarm. There is no time frame specified, but it does say that the Military will disband. The reason for this is because the govts of the world believe peace is possible through disarmament, which it is not.

With all the wars all over the planet, why would they believe this?


Anyway, the first camps are going to begin coming up by the end of '09 and the rest will be shortly after. It makes sense if you want to remove those people who cause problems to build the camps, people who panic will go straight to them feeling "safe" because the govt says they will protect them.

But they won't be able to because they'll be disarmed



It is easier to make a cow want to go to slaughter than to make them. Remember this, you do not have to go, you can stand up and speak out against it. Simply call your representative and tell them that if they vote for it that you will not vote for them. Enough people call and they will vote against it.

Do you really think if the government was building death camps, they would stop if you voted against someone? Building a death camp for US citizens within it's own boarders basically means everything the US stands for including laws and the Constitution go out the window so what will a no vote accomplish?


Also if you feel that your safety is an issue, there are people out there that are preparing to take in those in fear, and those who panic. Check this out www.youtube.com... Some would consider these folks oddballs and wierdo, but if you think about what their doing it makes sense because the stuff is fixing to hit the fan. If you want more information on other organizations please don't hesitate to email me Dotwr001@aol.com, it is time that someone stepped up and said no, that they are going to sit back and let these things happen. Email me, I can give you more info dotwr001@aol.com


According to you, all governments will be disarmed and if you are correct, then the government won't be able to force anyone to do anything so what is there to worry about?



posted on Jan, 31 2009 @ 01:26 PM
link   
I think these camps may be for a comming economic crisis. With hundreds of thousands of people and families with no place to live, it would be better than a High School Gym. There may be no conspiricy at all..........I HOPE!!



posted on Jan, 31 2009 @ 01:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by Dotwr001
Brothers and Sisters,

These FEMA camps as people continue calling them, are beginning to form. I live near a military establishment and my father works there, not that he is on their side. He actually wants to quit because he sees things that no red blooded American would want to happen, let alone allow it to. If you haven't heard by now I will tell you, there is Govt legislation that states the US as well as the rest of the world must disarm. There is no time frame specified, but it does say that the Military will disband. The reason for this is because the govts of the world believe peace is possible through disarmament, which it is not. Anyway, the first camps are going to begin coming up by the end of '09 and the rest will be shortly after. It makes sense if you want to remove those people who cause problems to build the camps, people who panic will go straight to them feeling "safe" because the govt says they will protect them. It is easier to make a cow want to go to slaughter than to make them. Remember this, you do not have to go, you can stand up and speak out against it. Simply call your representative and tell them that if they vote for it that you will not vote for them. Enough people call and they will vote against it. Also if you feel that your safety is an issue, there are people out there that are preparing to take in those in fear, and those who panic. Check this out www.youtube.com... Some would consider these folks oddballs and wierdo, but if you think about what their doing it makes sense because the stuff is fixing to hit the fan. If you want more information on other organizations please don't hesitate to email me Dotwr001@aol.com, it is time that someone stepped up and said no, that they are going to sit back and let these things happen. Email me, I can give you more info dotwr001@aol.com


I don't know if this has been said yet, and I apoligize if it has, but I can not access the video you've linked to here. Please check web address. Thanks.



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 02:43 PM
link   
I was wondering something about these camps today. What alternative is there? I mean, wouldn't you all agree it might be nice to have recourse for people in certain disasters, especially after Katrina?

So, I'm not saying I am in favor of the military installations being used as emergency centers, but is it not better than nothing? Assuming there is no ill intent.



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by buttafuqua
 
"If you spent half the time looking for ways to progress society within whatever constrains we currently have, versus trying to constantly find the "Boogeyman", perhaps the world wouldn't be in such a terrible spot."

Ppl called in to their congress critters to tell them to vote no.

It did exactly "zero" good once the re-vote was scheduled and
they were put under pressure.

The democrats control the senate and the house, and the war in
Iraq KEPT going and it still is today.

If you think this is a representative government you're deluding yourself.

It is a plutocracy, the ppl with the money make the rules.

We have lobbyists that make more than the president.

Why do they get paid that much ?

BECAUSE IT WORKS.

You will not see that in the press.

It is all well and good you believe in the system, the problem is
the system doesn't believe in you.

Good Luck with that.




[edit on 2-2-2009 by Ex_MislTech]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 05:41 PM
link   



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 05:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by wintermarches
I was wondering something about these camps today. What alternative is there? I mean, wouldn't you all agree it might be nice to have recourse for people in certain disasters, especially after Katrina?

So, I'm not saying I am in favor of the military installations being used as emergency centers, but is it not better than nothing? Assuming there is no ill intent.


But what good is having these places all across the country? Surely we couldn't have a disaster that bad all across America at one time. And if we did, such as a nuclear strike or Yellow Stone erupting, I don't think a few military installation camps would protect us anyway. And they certainly couldn't hold 300 000 000 Americans at one time.

[edit on 1-2-2009 by Totakeke]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 05:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aliensfindmeifyoucan
www.wimp.com...



That's been proven to be a fake. Watch the chair in the background.

This would be where the second line goes.


[edit on 1-2-2009 by detachedindividual]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 05:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by detachedindividual

Originally posted by Aliensfindmeifyoucan
www.wimp.com...



That's been proven to be a fake. Watch the chair in the background.

This would be where the second line goes.


[edit on 1-2-2009 by detachedindividual]


Of course it's fake. Notice the little "Onion-Span" thing in the corner? This comes from none other than The Onion, everyone's favorite satire news source.


[edit on 1-2-2009 by Totakeke]



posted on Feb, 1 2009 @ 05:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Totakeke
 


They need to be closer to the population.

In a civil unrest scenario, you don't want to be transporting a lot of prisoners hundreds of miles.

In a regional emergency, these sites could also be used for secure operations and planning, to have to plan from hundreds of miles away wouldn't help, especially with deployment of military or aid.

Again, I'm pretty sure these are multipurpose sites.
They'd be useful in many different scenarios.

It seems that a lot of these sites were already military anyway, or were industrial. They could easily be bought by FEMA and have little done to them to make them useful as a secure compound.

Detention of dissidents is only one scenario these sites could be used for, but it would be interesting to see how the square footage of each correlates to the local populations of major towns and cities. That would give an idea of what kind of figure they are anticipating would cause unrest in any given situation.



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 03:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Aliensfindmeifyoucan
www.wimp.com...



The onion, it is always good for a laugh.

Though it is odd how a lot of directive 51 is classified.

Funny how we can have laws passed that we are not allowed
to know what they are in even the slightest manner.

Things that make you go hmmmm...



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 10:52 AM
link   


I truely thought the Congress kept going along with Bush,...


What the hell are you talking about the bill states it was brought up during OBAMA admin. January of 09 eh....haha Bush what? Bush What????


Its Obama now.....and for the next 4 years



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 05:06 PM
link   
If and when the G men show up at my house they will be in for a very bad suprise. The only way they can round up that many people is if the public go along with it. So when it starts fight back with every thing. If not look what happend to the jews



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 07:44 PM
link   



posted on Feb, 2 2009 @ 09:28 PM
link   


Rep. Alcee L. Hastings, D-Fla., has introduced to the House of Representatives a new bill, H.R. 645, calling for the secretary of homeland security to establish no fewer than six national emergency centers for corralling civilians on military installations.

The proposed bill, which has received little mainstream media attention, appears designed to create the type of detention center that those concerned about use of the military in domestic affairs fear could be used as concentration camps for political dissidents, such as occurred in Nazi Germany.

link

Why isn't this making the front pages?

Where is the outrage that we saw when it was Bush that was destined to be dictator?

WELL WHO'S YO DICTATOR NOW, B@TCH??!??!

I guess now that it's Obama I guess it's OK.

Do you know where your nearest Oba-FE-MA camp is?



posted on Feb, 4 2009 @ 06:40 AM
link   
new information:

link:www.roguegovernment.com...

from Army - TITLED CIVILAN INMATE LABOR PROGRAM

Link:www.army.mil...

another article titled:
FEMA looks at expanded use of trains in hurricane evacuations of sick and elderly
link to article:www.iht.com...


It is simply impossible to dismiss all of these separate reports as pure coincidence. There is a definitive push to setup a fully functioning apparatus that will be used in a time of civil strife or any sort of national emergency to have the capability to round up large groups of people and put them in FEMA run detention camps. It is important to note that this is not some sort of left-wing conspiracy to round up people who don’t like Barack Obama as Family Security Matters believes. Both Republicans and Democrats have been behind this agenda for several decades, as all of this information indicates.

It is true that nobody knows with 100% certainty if the government will round up large numbers of political dissidents during a time of civil strife. However, they are certainly building the infrastructure to do it. With the global economy collapsing around the world, there will naturally be an increasing amount of dissent the worse the economy gets. The protests in Iceland, France, Greece and in other countries is evidence of this. As a result, all of this information should be of great concern to the American people. After all, it is doubtful that they are getting this infrastructure ready if they didn’t think that they might have to use it in the future.



posted on Feb, 4 2009 @ 07:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Spectre0o0
 


Did your search and found the same old (10+ years) hogwash. At least they could update their sites now that we know they don't exist but money is being gathered to build them

mikell



new topics

top topics



 
176
<< 16  17  18    20  21 >>

log in

join