It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thinkmore
This is exactly why the uneducated common man should not attempt to divine the meanings of scientific papers and articles.
Most people lack critical thinking skills and common sense. They see a phrase or word they understand, and start jumping to conclusions based on their current base of knowledge. Which is usually nothing.
Originally posted by GeeGee
Originally posted by Thinkmore
This is exactly why the uneducated common man should not attempt to divine the meanings of scientific papers and articles.
Most people lack critical thinking skills and common sense. They see a phrase or word they understand, and start jumping to conclusions based on their current base of knowledge. Which is usually nothing.
I am in full agreement. There are a lot of people here saying that "scientists lack common sense." This statement is absurd. Scientists, especially physicists, have to take rigorous logic courses since it accommodates both science and mathematics.
Originally posted by majestictwo
And how many times do we hear scientists say we got it wrong and we had to rethink our theory’s. Scientists developed the LHC and it broke first time. They might be right about the black hole but the machine failed. What if it fails at the wrong time.
Wooops “I wish I could do that again”
Originally posted by GeeGee
Originally posted by majestictwo
And how many times do we hear scientists say we got it wrong and we had to rethink our theory’s. Scientists developed the LHC and it broke first time. They might be right about the black hole but the machine failed. What if it fails at the wrong time.
Wooops “I wish I could do that again”
Scientists are not some superhuman creatures, they're human just like the rest of us, and thus are prone to making errors. Creating a black hole that will swallow up the Earth is just not that simple. It requires tremendous amounts of energy that cannot be harnessed by anything we possess today. Accidents do happen, but people need to realize that scientists make mistakes just like anyone else does. If we were to halt all scientific study for the sake of paranoia, the world would remain a mystery forever and technological progress would come to an end.
Originally posted by majestictwo
But surely in this case you can't afford an accident
Black holes could last minutes
Perhaps longer who knows, all I'm saying is we don't know and its risky
Originally posted by GeeGee
You have to consider two things:
1) If these black holes do actually occur, they would be tiny (subatomic scale). Which means they will have no effect on matter because of a very, very weak gravitational influence. The most likely outcome is that they will either not occur or decay via Hawking radiation.
2) The universe pounds our atmosphere with cosmic rays constantly. These particle collisions are several times more powerful than the LHC. So, if particle collisions do indeed create micro black holes, they must be happening in our atmosphere. Since we have not been sucked into a black hole yet, we can either conclude that these black holes evaporate quickly or that they do not occur.
[edit on 4-2-2009 by GeeGee]
Originally posted by Teknikal
Lets just put it this way the particles do not lose speed in space (mostly due to the fact that they are all going in the same direction away from the sun) so if they do collide and possibly make a black hole it shoots away at close to the speed of light, at that speed it's quite safe for it to fly right through the earth because it will always have escape velocity.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Not really sure how you think this would be safe. If this is what is happening then many of those particles by now would have flown off as you say and would have collided with one of the other planets or moons in our system. Imagine the number of black holes being formed if what you say here is correct. They would have smacked into say, Jupiter, slowed down, sucked in mass and become bigger already. So I'm not really sure it's creating black holes. Or of course they are evaporating as predicted.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Remember how the LHC could not be turned off, even with the power turned off? This is why.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
*Tekinikal is right in his assessment. Like two bullets colliding, they neutralize (in theory) each others energy and would then both be equally affected by Earth's gravity. If the bullets were particles and the collision created a "black hole", it would have nowhere to go but down....
Remember the helium leak? That is where it came from.
Originally posted by googolplex
Originally posted by QueenofWeird
How much mass is needed to create a singularity with a very small surface? When two particles hit eachother in the collider I assume they will just break up to show their secret ingredients. So how could a tiny object with a monster mass arise?
They won't create singularity, they won't create Black Hole.
When they smash these together all will happen is the disruption of a natural order, all of the chaos will be it trying to restore natural order.