Is Free Speech Dying?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 26-1-2009 @ 07:32 PM by Ahabstar
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984



In the states, we have them at political rallies and public speeches for pretty much the same reason. Speaking out inside the Capitol Building (audible on any subject, even how well the politician is liked) is not accepted at any time..One could call it a capitol offense except usually you are just escorted out of the building unless you say anything explicitly wrong. Like I won't vote for you again.

Being as to be a politician you have to be within a certain class of unestablished nobility (because establishing it would be unconstitutional) therefore anything that makes them feel less than ecstatically happy borders on Hate Speech.


reply posted on 26-1-2009 @ 09:22 PM by ImaginaryReality1984
reply to post by Ahabstar



Yep i've read about those. It's not just that however it's also all the political correctness talk. What worries me is that comedians are now being told what they can and cannot say and i've always thought that comedians being dictated to is a real indicator of a loss of free speech. That may sound silly to some but comedians are at the forefront of accepted speech when you think about it.

[edit on 26-1-2009 by ImaginaryReality1984]


reply posted on 27-1-2009 @ 10:13 AM by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Recently Holland enacted a law stating that it is an offense to bad mouth Islam.


The Vatican has also stated that freedom of speech doesn't include the right to offend religious sentiments and that intolerance is a threat to peace... So, it seems this kind of thing is happening around the world about different religions. This is certainly a concern.

What is so bothersome is that violence is being attributed to the WORDS people speak (hate speech) along with those who take violent action. That line between speech (or expression) and ACTION is being obliterated. And, in my opinion, that's the line that we must keep solid. Sticks and stones, you know?

But making religion a special case opens the door for making other special cases. How crazy would it be if, here in the US, we were told that freedom of speech no longer includes the right to offend governmental institutions or policies? That makes it clear how ridiculous this whole 'offending religion' idea is.


[edit on 27-1-2009 by Benevolent Heretic]


reply posted on 27-1-2009 @ 11:23 AM by ImaginaryReality1984
Originally posted by Cio88
You obviously don't support Free speech. You have removed my sig? why?

Its my opinion. You need to follow your own rules.. or do you not feel you have to follow them?

You always talk about people showing respect and staying on topic. My post was on topic ... and using my free speech. But, because you are head honcho.. and no body questions you .. you troll in and remove posts. I just seems like there is a little kid at the helm of your account.


Your post wasn't on topic and here is why.

ATS is a political discussion forum. If there weren't rules to prevent profanity, offensive material and political baiting then any discussion would devolve into a slanging match between parties and nothing would ever get discussed. Issues would be avoided instead replaced by personal attacks.

I was referring to freedom of speech that is guaranteed under a healthy democracy or republic. If you cannot see the difference between a private website based on even handed discussion and the government then i'm afraid i can't help you.


Benevolent Heretic.

Yes i am very concerned that it seems to be the religious leading this movement against free speech. Maybe it's because they fear their grasp is slipping on the world, however this isn't the case. Religion now seems even more popular than ever before. Of course it's their right to say they want to be protected under law, afterall that is free speech. However the government should guarantee free speech with legislation and in fact it used to.

However the government themselves started this trend when they labelled certain things as hate speech. Whilst hate speech is obviously a real thing it is very different from hateful acts as you stated. As long as someone is just speaking i really don't have a problem. I may completely disagree or even hate what they're saying, but it's their right to say it.

[edit on 27-1-2009 by ImaginaryReality1984]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Memorial day thoughts.
  Posted 2 days ago with 11 member flags
Global governance and the challenge to the American Constitution
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
Abraham Lincoln Filed a Patent for "Facebook\' in 1845..? (HOAX)
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Explosive Scoop on Obama from Breitbart.com
  Posted 9 days ago with 1 member flags