It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by maybereal11
One every 3 hours? So in three hours time how many kids are not killed?
This "think of the children" crap is just that, crap. It clouds the reality with cheap emotion and petty sentiment.
[edit on 26-1-2009 by thisguyrighthere]
Originally posted by Ismail
Well I do find it kind of weird how some americans think it's ok to kill a guy for trying to steal their TV... It's kind of frightening because it shows how much some of you value life. (I.E. less that a TV, whats that, 100 $ for a good one ? )
Originally posted by Ismail
reply to post by Reaper106
As I said. A police officer does have to make sure the suspect is carrying a gun before he shoots.
[edit on 26-1-2009 by Ismail]
Originally posted by WhamBamTYM
" And the vast majority of robberies are perpetrated for cash, not to rape and kill."
Your cash and your belongings are like pieces of your being! It took your time, your life, your energy and your effort to collect those belongings. This makes them more than just things.
Originally posted by Ismail
reply to post by WhamBamTYM
Allow me to state that I do not consider what I own to be more important than another human's life. Be he a criminal.
The OP by highlighting that line is pulling the same crap in the opposite direction. CRAP.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Crap? "Clouds the reality with cheap emotion and petty sentiment"? Like in the OP where in big bold letters the rape and murder of an eleven year old girl is highlighted????
No
Do you support gun restrictions and safety regulations to regulate and keep safe those gun owners who are not as versed in gun safety as yourself?
Gun safety used to be a part of every school curriculum and family life until all this "guns are scary" garbage demonized the things and shoved them off into some dark corner or mystery and ignorance. We wouldnt have to force mandatory safety nonsense if these hoplophbes didnt make it so unsafe in the first place. Besides, what's to know beyond "point this end at what you want to kill"? By the way, I am a certified NRA safety and pistol instructor as well as a Range Safety Officer.
I am not even railing on about banning guns...I am telling the NRA as well as gun enthusiasts in general...If you want to preserve your right to bare arms...then police your own! Make sure that there are laws, regulations and mandatory gun safety programs in place for gun owners to keep people safe
....Not everyone is bastion of gun safety like yourself...actually I would venture a guess that every single one of the thousand or so accidental gun deaths last year were a relutant of folks who thought they were a perfect example of "safe" gun ownership as well.
And YES...I own firearms. Geez...grow up.
Originally posted by Ismail
Allow me to state that I do not consider what I own to be more important than another human's life. Be he a criminal.
Originally posted by Ismail
Well I do find it kind of weird how some americans think it's ok to kill a guy for trying to steal their TV... It's kind of frightening because it shows how much some of you value life. (I.E. less that a TV, whats that, 100 $ for a good one ? )
****
I'm just saying that the "shoot first ask questions later" seems to be a pretty irresponsible when the thing in your hand is made to kill. Warn the perp that you have a gun. Most people would just turn around and leave. Waiting in ambush as someone breaks down your door in order to get a clean head shot is plain criminal. If, once warned, the perp keeps on coming, then sure, plug him. But maybe not in the head. The point i'm trying to make is that I find nothing heroic about killing another man to protect your new stereo. Most burglars are there for the cash. Not to kill and rape. So glorifying the killing a man (which proves in any case how deconected with the reality of killing most of these gun whielders are) who will run away in the vast majority of case seems symptomatic of a sick wacko society
Originally posted by FritosBBQTwist
Whether it is a drug deal gone bad or a random robbery, he deserves to have been shot if not killed.
Just today my history teacher spoke of how a lion/tiger has its own territory and will kill those who enter it. He went on to say if someone enters his own home he will shoot and kill the intruder. A student talked back to him thinking that was absurd yet my teacher stood his ground. Made me feel a sense of pride knowing its not only the stereotyped redneck who agree.
Originally posted by die_another_day
isn't it true if the robber is unarmed you can't shoot him/her? Or is it just in some states?
A Castle Doctrine (also known as a Castle Law or a Defense of Habitation Law) is an American legal concept derived from English Common Law, which designates one's place of residence (or, in some states, any place legally occupied, such as one's car or place of work) as a place in which one enjoys protection from illegal trespassing and violent attack. It then goes on to give a person the legal right to use deadly force to defend that place (his/her "castle"), and/or any other innocent persons legally inside it, from violent attack or an intrusion which may lead to violent attack. In a legal context, therefore, use of deadly force which actually results in death may be defended as justifiable homicide under the Castle Doctrine.
Castle Doctrines are legislated by state, and not all states in the US have a Castle Doctrine. The term "Make My Day Law" comes from the landmark 1985 Colorado statute that protects people from any criminal charge or civil suit if they use force - including deadly force - against an invader of the home.[1] The law's nickname is a reference to the famous line uttered by Clint Eastwood's character Dirty Harry in the 1983 film Sudden Impact, "Go ahead, make my day."