Um cool i guess, but way to post something that says its entirely fictitious. Like right underneath the slide show window it says it.

Blackjack - Part 2. A slideshow story

Blackjack Part 2 - The events portrayed in this slideshow are entirely fictitious

Mungo

What do you think it's going to say "THIS IS A REAL DEPICTION OF WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN AHHHHHHHHH!?!?!?!?!"


NO.

There were many signs prior to 9/11 happening.

This could be a prior to a BIG event as well.

To me, it just looks as though someone found out how to use the lens flare in photoshop/GIMP. I wonder why its on the telegraph site though.

Also remember June is 6th month. June 22, 2009 (22 + 2009) = 15 = 6 and it says 6 nukes go off in Canada, US, and Mexico. So it's 666.

Pre-Text to FEMA Camps/coffins, Martial Law, North American Union, Amero Currency, War on Iran / Pakistan, etc.

They all come to play.

For those that think this is stupid because it's "fiction" remember if it's not serious then WHY is it on telegraph.co.uk site?

And no it's not for fear mongoring.

And no it's not for fear mongoring.

Well, you sure had me fooled.

Not a one liner.

The flag eludes to a one world governemnt nwo. 5 stars for 5 world regions. Also the Brittish bobby in the last shot has the flag on his shirt and an Eagle holding arrows in his claws on his hat. That looks like the American Eagle.

Originally posted by bobbylove321
The "Elite" always reveal their info first, then act upon it. Hence why we keep hearing talks about a NWO, etc.

Well, the "Union of North America" logo is a bit of a worry in slide 24.

Maybe it's just a way of reminding people how bad WMDs are, in order to justify "going after them"? They haven't been able to provide anything else, so maybe a fictional slideshow will do?

Who would this coalition of Islamists and Christian doomsday cultists be? It's not too hard to figure out if you have been paying attention this decade. I am looking at this Blackjack slide show as a piece graphic novel type literature.

Anyone still reading Reinhardts site? Feb 9th is his big fail date for some government.

Entertaining at the very least.

I think whoever is behind this little story is also a member of these forums, they seem to be including almost everything we have been discussing over the last few months.

I still don't understand the point of this story.
Why is the telegraph posting this up at all, without any explanation or reason?

This is all extremely suspicious if you ask me.