It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Echoing Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's words one week ago, New York Sen. Charles Schumer said Sunday that he could support prosecution for Bush officials that participated in torture or broke other laws.
"If there are egregious cases, I don't think you can say, blanket, no prosecutions," Schumer told Fox's Chris Wallace Sunday morning. "If there are egregious cases, yes, you have to look at them.''
Pelosi Open to Prosecution of Bush Administration Officials
The House speaker suggests to "FOX News Sunday" that the law might compel Democrats to press forth on some prosecutions of Bush administration officials, saying they may not "have a right to ignore" them.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is receptive to the idea of prosecuting some Bush administration officials, while letting others who are accused of misdeeds leave office without prosecution, she told Chris Wallace in an interview on "FOX News Sunday."
Originally posted by questioningall
If people think about it, Bush has done even worst than Saddam did.
Ex-US attorney joins terror prosecution team
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — A former U.S. attorney who was among nine fired by the Bush administration in 2006 has been working as a prosecutor of suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Word of David Iglesias' position surfaced as the nascent Obama administration circulated a draft executive order that calls for closing the Guantanamo Bay detention center within a year and reviewing the cases of the nearly 245 inmates still held there. The order also would suspend pending war crimes cases for 120 days.
Iglesias, who said he is speaking for himself and not for the Office of Military Commissions, said his cases still could go forward in a federal court, a military court-martial or with the commission, just not at Guantanamo.
He declined to comment about any transition of the war crimes process or about the type of cases he is prosecuting.
AFP
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I would really like to see prosecutions, but I don't have much hope for that and when I think realistically, I'd rather the government be spending that money on things we really need now and for our future, than to punish someone.
Pelosi Open to Prosecution of Bush Administration Officials
The House speaker suggests to "FOX News Sunday" that the law might compel Democrats to press forth on some prosecutions of Bush administration officials, saying they may not "have a right to ignore" them.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is receptive to the idea of prosecuting some Bush administration officials, while letting others who are accused of misdeeds leave office without prosecution, she told Chris Wallace in an interview on "FOX News Sunday."
Originally posted by Mdv2
Are you aware that this of great importance to the West and in particular America's national security?
Originally posted by MissysWorld
Who would have ever thought the day would come when we would prosecute a past President, but postpone trials of TERRORISTS who KILLED thousands in our homeland..
Originally posted by MissysWorld
Who would have ever thought the day would come when we would prosecute a past President, but postpone trials of TERRORISTS who KILLED thousands in our homeland..
Originally posted by whaaa
Anyway have you forgotten the investigation into Clinton's affairs. It's nothing new. Remember watergate? Nixon?
If Bush and his administration have done nothing wrong; I would think they would welcome an investigation.
lol:
[edit on 25-1-2009 by whaaa]
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Are we a Banana Republic that prosecutes those of the last administration? In America we don’t do that, we want each administration to smoothly hand over the leadership to the next no matter how far apart their views are. Or do you want each administration to hunt down their predecessors, and carry that fear during their own in what they face at the end of their adminstration?