It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ppp
The Raptor should be cancelled, it is not needed.
NO country has the capability to bring the fight to the USA, and win, although some would be able to do a large ammount of damage. The planned 1700 JSF would be able to repel the strongest of attacks on the USA mainland, and Raptor would add liitle to the defence.
In an offensive role, the carrier airwings would be more than capable to destroy the enemies air force, and the countries who could defeat the carriers would be likely to defeat them with a nuclear weapons.
If the USAF wants more power in the air combat area, then the $37.6 billion for Raptors would be better spent on 1253 more JSF, bringing the total to 2953 for the USAF, which is 500 more than the USAF had F4's! Of course, the economies of scale realised from 1253 more planes would increase this number further.
The arguement could be made that JSF isnt as capable in air to air, but jsf could be made with 2 available radars, one for export and one for the USAF/RAF/USN/RN/USMC. The JSF export could have a radar similar to that of the F16 block 60E's APG-80, and a radar more comparable to the F/A22's APG-77 for the USAF/RAF/USN/RN/USMC.
The x-45 unmaned jets will do the same job and will be much cheaper+ no need for pilot training.
Originally posted by MarkLuitzen
bring the technology the money and the recources man and material to the space exploration program of Nasa so we don't spend it in militairy but in civil space programs so if an attack happens we could strike back from space with strike carriers is space....
science fiction will stay the same if you will not and aren't willing to change it in to science fact.
my conclusion if the program will be cancelled give the recources to NASA.... the pilots can go on to be astronauts.
You forgot to post the results above. The bvr kill ratio - 10.1:1=F22 , 4.5:1=Typhoon. Also I dont think the EF is bad plane but it is simply overpriced - for its capabilities.
Originally posted by Supercool
Hi! I'm new here so I thought I'd say that "Why should we continue to build so many Steath Fighters like the F-22 Raptor, when we can simply add something like Russia's "Plasma Cloud" Cloaking Device that renders plane invisible by dissapating electromagnetic waves?"
It was built by Russia's Keldysh Research Center, it can be added to existing aircraft cheaply!
The USAF has had such devices on the SR-71 Blackbird and the B-1 Lancer for years. LOL!
Originally posted by Amur_Tiger
Well if they really need the money and really want a nice fighter out of it, they could had the project over to the Russians and get it done for half price!
:p
I know it wouldn't actually work because of all the preperations American companies have made to build these things, but yeah next time they want a fighter they should talk the the Russians, I'm sure they'd be happy to oblige........ mmmm funding.
Originally posted by Supercool
The F-22 is a waste of money and it should be canceled.
It will not give the USA any kind of advantage over say an enemy like Russia or China or India.
It is too expensive and it is not stealthy enough.
They will probaby build about 100 and cancel the program like they did with the B-2 Bomber after 21 planes.
The B-2 wasn't worth 2.2 billion dollars USD each.
Originally posted by Supercool
The F-22 is a waste of money and it should be canceled.
It will not give the USA any kind of advantage over say an enemy like Russia or China or India.
It is too expensive and it is not stealthy enough.
They will probaby build about 100 and cancel the program like they did with the B-2 Bomber after 21 planes.
The B-2 wasn't worth 2.2 billion dollars USD each.