It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to post by WyrdeOne
I am totally different. I do not hold hands with a socialist who wants to destroy our way of life.
You need to realize that is my position.
Originally posted by jsobecky
That would have been the biggest coverup, employed so many people, had to have been so intricately timed, financed, and manned, to have been impossible.
Originally posted by jsobecky
To all of you saying 9/11 was an inside job...you sad fools. The world is laughing at you. You have ZERO evidence of that notion
I recently viewed a lecture presented by Architect Richard Gage – founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. (AE911Truth.org). The lecture: 9/11: Blueprint for Truth, is available for online streaming at: www.ae911truth.org...
Richard Gage is a practicing architect in California and with 20 years of experience with recent projects designing large steel-frame buildings. He has organized over 500 building professionals, architects and engineers to petition congress for a new investigation of the terror attacks of 9/11/2001.
After some initial skepticism, I found AE911Truth not to be an organization of conspiracy theorists but rather a group of over 500 architects and engineers and nearly 2,700 associate supporters risking their professional livelihood as American patriots to bring the “inconvenient truth” that three (3) World Trade Center buildings were deliberately demolished by controlled demolition on 9/11/2001.
After viewing the lecture I became very disturbed that in seven years the overwhelming evidence of controlled demolition has not yet succeeded to convene a Grand Jury to assess the need for a criminal investigation.
I recall long ago when President Bush promised a full investigation of 9/11, but today we still have no trial with sworn witnesses, evidence and testimony conducted in a court of law.
The implication of Gage’s conclusions are horrific when I consider 9/11 terror was used as a pretext for the invasion of two countries and the huge loss of civilian lives in the US, Iraq, and Afghanistan. When I discovered that our own FBI admits they have no evidence that Osama Bin Laden was involved with the 9/11 attacks I feel compelled to bring my discovery to the attention to every member of congress, senate and sitting federal judge that I possibly can.
In his presentation, Gage employs the scientific method to test the theory of controlled demolition vs. the government’s finding (NIST) that fire was responsible for the collapses of three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7.
Hard evidence exists in the USGS aerial survey that recorded surface temperatures between 1,160 and 1,377 Deg. F. were measured for five weeks following 9/11/2001. Workers at the sites witnessed molten steel at all three building sites confirming the underground temperatures exceeded the melting point of steel, or 2,750 deg. F. The hypothesis with the best probability to fit these finding is that controlled demolition with incendiaries like thermite was the cause.
I now share the following conclusions with Richard Gage and more than 500 Architects and Engineers subscribed to his group of Architects and Engineers and thousands on non-professionals subscribed to his group:
1) Richard Gage has proved the hypothesis of controlled demolition beyond any reasonable doubt and that the government’s published conclusions can not possibly be true. Fires could not have burned hot enough to cause the collapse of WTC1,WTC2 or WTC7. Amazingly, the government investigators (NIST) admitted that they never tested the hypothesis for controlled demolition in any scenario. (When will they?)
2) Controlled Demolition was responsible for the collapse of all 3 WTC buildings. All of the compelling evidence presented by Gage completely matches the hypothesis of controlled demolition. Common sense tells me that steel and other metal parts inside jet engines will not melt, even after many hours of burning fuel in the air or on the ground.
3) I believe that a reasonable person, presented with all the evidence in a court of law would find that the official government explanation that concludes that fire was the cause of the gravitational speed collapses of all 3 skyscrapers can not possibly be true.
4) I viewed the 2006 PBS documentary: “America Rebuilds” to see Larry Silverstein, owner of WTC7, admit that he got a call from the fire chief to suggest that they “pull” (deliberately demolish) WTC7. This is a shocking confession that deserves screaming headlines, yet Silverstein has never been accused of terrorism, nor has he been placed under oath to answer to his own admission as a willing accessory to the deliberate destruction of WTC7. Just as disturbing is the mainstream media’s failure to report this story.
5) A 2007 Zogby poll revealed that half of New Yorkers believe US leaders had
foreknowledge of an impending terror attack and “consciously failed” to act. Two-thirds
(66%) of New Yorkers called for a new probe of unanswered questions by Congress or New York’s Attorney General. Source: www.zogby.com...
6) A 2006 Scripps Howard poll found that one-third of the American public suspects that
federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East. Source: www.scrippsnews.com...