It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ashley
Im sure Clinton and Gore would testify in public,what have they got to lose and Clinton would get to be on the T.V.
The problem is , i'll bet a condition put down by the Bush administration, is that they cant testify publicly. That would make the only people testifying privately Bush and Cheney.
That wouldn't look too good for them and they have enough to worry about,you know lying and everything.
Originally posted by Seekerof
All of the people who have testified before the partisan 9/11 "Witch Hunt"...errr, I mean the Commission, should have their testimonies made public and open to access.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
No. Clinton is the former pres and Gore the VP. as such, I think thye do have some level of privilege. Their testimononies were heard by elected representatives.
as quoted by ThomasCrowne
Therefore, Seeker, it makes no difference what was asked of Clinton and Gore. Besides, do you think it makes a difference? They have both proven to be unconcerned about lying, and Clinton has no problem lying under oath. That is what is so funny about the liberal hypocrits trying their best to paint Shrub as a liar!
Former President Bill Clinton last week told the September 11 commission that he never admitted passing up a chance to have Osama bin Laden arrested -- even though his words were caught on tape, NewsMax.com reports.
Former Sen. Bob Kerrey, Nebraska Democrat, revealed the Clinton denial to WDAY Fargo, N.D., radio host Scott Hennen for an interview set for broadcast today, NewsMax said.
The transcript shows that Mr. Kerrey had no idea when he questioned the ex-president that his denial is provably false.