It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An evil person knows the truth. They reject it. They attempt to replace it with a lie. In EVERY circumstance where the word Evil is applied these two conditions must exist. Otherwise it is not Evil.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
the word evil is like the word god - it comes loaded with so many different meanings for so many different people - it ends up meaning almost nothing
but it means what it means to you
if evil doesn't exist - we still need a word to explain just how wrong wrong can feel
"that was really, really bad" just doesn't go far enough sometimes
It seems to me that most atheists believe stealing a purse from a financially poor blind elderly woman is evil. Why? From an atheist perspective, what would be a logical reason that stealing from old ladies is evil?
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by truthquest
It seems to me that most atheists believe stealing a purse from a financially poor blind elderly woman is evil. Why? From an atheist perspective, what would be a logical reason that stealing from old ladies is evil?
Not evil. Wrong.
It is wrong because it breaches the basic social contract: 'I shall do as I would be done by.' This is the agreement that enables human beings to live in large, genetically distant social groups. One who breaches it by attacking another harms not only his victim but the whole of human society, and thus hurts every member in it. Logical enough for you?
Originally posted by truthquest
Do good & evil fundamentally exist, or are they just abstractions of human emotion... just words describing emotional opinions?
Originally posted by truthquest
To an atheist or many agnostics, I suppose what is good and evil should be purely speculative and opinion. "One man's evil is another man's good." A lot of true atheists seem to have blind faith that there is fundamentally/absolutely right and wrong.
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
My interpretation of what atheists/agnostics are all telling me here is that what is evil is entirely an abstraction or matter of opinion to be defined by each person, rather than an absolute or fundamental truth or fundamental force that applies equally to all people.
Then I could actually move towards believing the idea that most atheists have a non faith-based concept of good/evil.
Originally posted by The Cyfre
Originally posted by truthquest
Do good & evil fundamentally exist, or are they just abstractions of human emotion... just words describing emotional opinions?
You're speaking as if good and evil are actual things when they're really intangible ideas spawned of human ethics and morals.
Originally posted by truthquest
To an atheist or many agnostics, I suppose what is good and evil should be purely speculative and opinion. "One man's evil is another man's good." A lot of true atheists seem to have blind faith that there is fundamentally/absolutely right and wrong.
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
I'm actually kind of offended by the broad (and incorrect) generalization of atheists. True atheism would not have blind faith that there is an absolute right and wrong, quite the opposite. One of our strongest points of pride is our LACK of blind faith.
How could I as an atheist make a leap of faith that good and evil existed before man, when I don't agree that blind faith in ANYTHING is sane?
Originally posted by truthquest
This question is especially for those who believe that nothing should be accepted to be true on blind faith alone. Do good & evil fundamentally exist, or are they just abstractions of human emotion... just words describing emotional opinions?
To an atheist or many agnostics, I suppose what is good and evil should be purely speculative and opinion. "One man's evil is another man's good." A lot of true atheists seem to have blind faith that there is fundamentally/absolutely right and wrong.
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Originally posted by truthquest
Explain to me using only logical reasoning (nothing faith-based) how stealing a purse from a poor elderly women in Miami so you can buy up collector's items for example is evil, wrong, or immoral. If you can do that then I do profusely apologize for having wrongly stated that most atheists use faith-based reasoning.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
I just read through all the posts - and I haven't heard anyone say anything that fits what you're saying above - not exactly
it seems to me most people have said something closer to the opposite of what you're suggesting
I do think it's necessary to have a discussion about what evil means before anyone one of us can commit to how they feel about evil - and how they determine for themselves what is and isn't evil
dictionary aside - it's not that simple - defining a word doesn't solve the problem
Then I could actually move towards believing the idea that most atheists have a non faith-based concept of good/evil.
I gather from this that you don't believe that atheists are capable of determining right from wrong without resorting to religion?
Originally posted by truthquest
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
I believe people who abandon their religion may still retain their moral values because they still have faith-based beliefs despite claiming to not hold faith-based beliefs. Personally I determine most of my moral values using slow and measured gut instinct... and 0% logic. I think I only use logic to justify what my blind-faith gut instinct is regarding good and evil. If I say to someone: "Why is stealing evil/immoral/wrong." what they are going to do is as quickly as possible look for logical reasons to justify a faith-based belief.
I'm not trying to offend atheists but rather show that perhaps blind faith is not by default bad since that may be what gives us our moral values. Either that or learn how I am wrong.
But again, by showing the logical thought process you have used to determine any specific thing is evil/immoral/wrong then you can without too much difficulty I think change my mind. So I'd say regarding the definition of evil to tell me something that you think is evil and then explain the position without faith-based reasoning.
[edit on 23-1-2009 by truthquest]
I disagree with your assumption that morals are faith based regardless...
I think morality is inherent in all people...
If you believe in god - wouldn't you assume that god would have design his / her creation with functional PURPOSE built in????
I can say the same thing for animals...
If you run at a dog with a stick screaming it will react much the same way that a human would.
The concept of Morality is the BLIND faith here. Morality is a concept as defined by humans who have assigned a particular definition and notion for the WORD.
There have been a few cases of dolphins saving drowning humans... Why - Morality??? Religion???
We are all hard wired, distinct, unique and universal all at the same time.
Morality is a standard and subjective, far to small a field to understand creation.
"GOD" is far more awesome then our one dimensional minds can comprehend.
You may definitely have something here though so please go on but know that I'm not convinced yet.
Why a sign a contract you don't have to?
How does stealing the purse from an old woman effect the gene
pool of a group?
***
* * *
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by huckfinn
An evil person knows the truth. They reject it. They attempt to replace it with a lie. In EVERY circumstance where the word Evil is applied these two conditions must exist. Otherwise it is not Evil.
Not so simple, Huck.
There are times in the life of every human being when the truth is so unpalatable we cannot accept it. We would rather tell ourselves that a lie is true, and alter our representation or interpretation of the facts to support it. Thus many belief-systems arise - some religious, some political, some philosophical. There are many such belief-systems, all fervently believed in by somebody. They cannot all be true.
Is this evil? Or is it simply the instinct of self-preservation acting under extreme circumstances?