reply to post by paxnatus
I have to object to your idea that Bush wanted to protect life.
Sure he may have wanted to protect the unborn, but he has insitgated the deaths of countless people, of varying nationalities, through his two wars.
I really take offence to the idea that the life of someone who is already born, grown up, and has a life, is worth less than that of one that has yet
to be born and establish itself.
If he was really for life he would NOT have started those two wars.
Anyway. That is tangential to the point.
My objection to this ban was, as I stated, it was often purposly misinterpreted to block birth-control period. That shoudl not be the intent.
It is as I have always said, if you really want to stop abortion, then step up the birth control distribution.
And please keep in mind that discussing abortion, and having an abortion, are two very different things.