Obama to Lift Ban on Funding for Groups Providing Abortions Overseas, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 21-1-2009 @ 03:55 PM by paxnatus

Obama to Lift Ban on Funding for Groups Providing Abortions Overseas


www.foxnews.com
President Obama will continue the back-and-forth of presidents before him by using the Roe v. Wade anniversary to allow non-governmental organizations working abroad to use U.S. funding to give counseling on or provide abortions.

President Obama will issue an executive order on Thursday reversing the Bush administration policy that bans the use of federal dollars by non-govermental organizations that discuss or provide abortions outside of the United States.

Obama will sign the executive order on the 36th anniversary of the landmark Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion in all 50 states.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 21-1-2009 @ 04:26 PM by silo13
reply to post by paxnatus


So now if I am understanding this correctly Obama is taking "our"money and sending it overseas to provide funding for non-governmental groups that perform abortions.


No, you’re not understanding it correctly.
I suggest you read the links provided by Asmeone2 as it seems the one you read misled you.

Edit:
Is that better in some way? When you break it down it means EXACTLY the same thing.


And NO it isn't the same thing for heaven's sake!

At present, no money can be distributed through the US Agency for International Development to charities and NGOs that promote, or provide information or advice about termination services.


Providing families with contraceptives is not abortion, nor is providing them with counseling on Family Planning.

peace

[edit on 21-1-2009 by silo13]


reply posted on 21-1-2009 @ 04:42 PM by paxnatus
Originally posted by asmeone2
Some links to support my position:

www.womensenews.org...
media.www.bgnews.com...


I do appreciate the links. Here is the difference though, Clinton just like Obama
wants to take life, while Bush wanted to preserve it.

"This policy recognizes our country's long history of providing international health care services, including voluntary family planning to couples around the world who want to make free and responsible decisions about the number and spacing of their children,"

Well, shouldn't responsible couples make decisions regarding family planning and the number of children they want before they are pregnant, not after?

"Presidents Reagan and Bush further banned U.S. aid to international groups that use their own money to support abortion -
either through performing the surgery, counseling on abortion as a family-planning option, or lobbying foreign governments on abortion policy."

Ya see, I said it earlier How is counseling on abortion as a family-planning option not the same as the one who provides abortion?

The quotes were taken from your source asmeone2: bgnews.com

A baby take it or leave it! No big deal! Thank you, Barry!


reply posted on 21-1-2009 @ 04:47 PM by silo13
reply to post by paxnatus



How is counseling on abortion as a family-planning option not the same as the one who provides abortion?


What part are you just refusing to read???

At present, no money can be distributed through the US Agency for International Development to charities and NGOs that promote, or provide information or advice about termination services. (abortion)


peace
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^