Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
What data do you have to help recreate the conditions that day? Were there temperature sensors inside the damaged areas? Stop motion cameras
transmitting interior pictures as the collapses began? Vibration sensors maybe? Do we have an accurate detailed description of which beams were
compromised from the impact and which ones were only exposed to the fire? And of those, do we know which ones still had their full fireproofing and
which ones did not?
Since a collapse happened in both situations at the towers, this minute information is obviously not as important as you make it out to be. Or we
wouldn't have seen the same result from 2 different events. No? Then how do you figure?
For an accurate recreation, you would need all of the above information (and more) and we do not have it...we will NEVER have it.
Obviously it doesn't have to be
that accurate if 3 totally different events can have 1 single result. No? Then how do you figure?
Don't give me the "we would have to recreate the exact scenario",
when 3 different scenarios resulted in the same conclusion.
Again, this phenomenon
has to be able to easily be recreated if 3 totally different scenarios can result in the same thing. Please. You
insult my intelligence.
