\Yes, there were other monsters involved. True. Trotsky (Bronstein) is certainly one of them , only because he lost to Stalin in fight over power in
USSR he probalby did not kill as many. And he is still symbol of some left movements. Go figure. \
Monster is a mild word for this "hero of Jewish nation"
the more the Jews have such heroes, like Bronstein, his ucle Abram Jovotinsky, Israel
Gelfand, the more they will be hated worldwide. Please tell me what you know about siberian intervention of 1918-20? what was the reason of it? the
number of ethnic russians killed? and who was behind it all?
Trotsky controlled OGPU and NKVD, even in exile he managed to do it, the leaders of these organs were all his people and they did their task well
untill caught and shot. now the archives opened and the documents testify for their subversive activities and sources of money received.
Also one can compare the dates of orders issued by Stalin and their realization of OGPU who conducted collectivization too... it was total sabotage,
those permanent revolutioners could do nothing except terror and murders... also they were good orators of course
\how can anyone descent claim that he benefited Russia? Before its collapse Russian empire was economically not worse then USSR during Stalin.
Peasants during empire were illiterate? Majority of them indeed were illiterate but alive. \
Well,slavery in Russia has been cancelled in 1861... reminds smth?
the USA! the Russians were just white slaves! check wikepedia. 90% of the population of Russia were peasants. All of them were illiterate and
majority worked with primitive agricultural tools.
Please substantiate your claim that Russian empire was not worse economically than the the USSR of Stalin period... ! All the figures are public - so
i guess it wouldnt be a complicated task?
)) To tell you the truth, I would have checked first before making such claims.
You will see that its far from truth. Like sky is far from ground
Alive? considering that every year the peasants were struck with hunger? there are also figures in internet considering the hungers in tsarist
\Because of Stalin's action lot of simple people were killed during collectivisation or world war 2, that would not have started if not Stalin.
Hitler alone could not make it happen.\
Of course Hitler couldn't
))) Will you tell me how its started?
Stalin did it?
As for collectivization it was a necessary step, there was no other way... thanks to OGPU and NKVD, yes, rich kulaks suffered. it didnt struck hard
simple peasants though. the results were more then successful.
\Current Russian leadership uses Stalin as an icon to show that central control is an only option for Russian federation to return superpower status,
and it is insane. He killed more citizens of USSR then Hitler did.\
Unfortunateley, they dont. And unfortunately, Russia wont return the status the USSR had and the level of life of the USSR. Unless a miracle
I wouldnt compare Stalin-Hitler...
The results of Stalin's rule:
3) agriculture mechanisation.
4) free education for all people.
5) free medicine
6) nuclear shield
7) mighty army
Besides, all this has been done in 29th years, 4 of which the USSR fought with a monstrously strong and mortally dangerous enemy, practically alone
and straining all forces, and from the moment of Stalin's coming to power and prior to the beginning of 30s, the country had been restored and
gathered by parts since the Lenin-Trotsky comrades could only destroy and carry out revolutions, but couldnt work and create.