I don't think they did sign it, and when one wishes to bring international agreements into the equation, one must understand their basis nature.
It's like a contract between combatants. One side breaks the rules, then guess what? There is no more agreement.
It is these arbitrary sensitivities that have prolonged this conflict year after year after year.
Those who would argue nuances, prefer to see people killed in smaller numbers, but in smaller numbers forever. Those who would argue against using
maximum force are most heartless. More total suffering over the long term.
When you get a tooth pulled, the dentist doesn't bring you in, day after day, week after week, month after month and each time incrementally twist
and turn on the tooth.
He doesn't prolong the pain incessantly, without resolution.
He pulls the damned thing, it hurts, it's sore, but it will heal once the problem is gone.
Some things aren't as cut and dried as we would like.
Sometimes you have to do the hard things in order to stop the suffering. Even this use of force by Israel wasn't nearly sufficient. And so we will
continue this ongoing conflict for another several decades.
Until one side or the other gets tired of dying or can't kill any further.
That's a fact.



