It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Harlequin
reply to post by BlueRaja
if you have a complaint re the T&C then instead of trolling , press ALERT - you are not a MOD , SUPER MOD or ADMIN , let them do the job and don`t pretend to be something you are not.
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by BlueRaja
First of all that was from october last year, and was a completely different attack - what the hell does that have to do with the current conflict?
Hamas are going to keep everything in the same place are they?
No tap dancing from me - as usual you attempt to cloud the issue and make this thread about hamas when in fact it is about israels use of WP in civilan area's.
You make definitive statements about the current conflict then back them up with old sources????
Now, as you made a definitive statement about Israel only targetting hamas and not civilians, please back that statement up and cite sources from the current conflict.
Hamas may shoulder some of the blame, but that's not the title or the debate in this thread, this is about israel using WP in gaza when they had previously denied it, and about the targetting of civilian area's.
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by dooper
Neither of you have provided anything even approaching proof.
Once again, I ask you to cite sources for youor assertions.
Especially those assertions where you have stated that you have definitive knowledge.
I'm afraid sources from 6 months ago concerning one bombing mission from an Israeli newspaper don't count as neutral - which is what both of you demand from everyone else.
UNRWA’s 29,000 area staff members are overwhelmingly composed of agency registered Palestinian refugees—an oft-criticized arrangement. There are several obvious downsides to UNRWA using staff members drawn from the beneficiary population. At worst, such staff may be more concerned about beneficiaries’ objectives than UNRWA’s. They can also be manipulated more easily than staff who are not beneficiaries, whether by argument or threat, to distort the agency’s objectives.
These are not hypothetical concerns. Back in October 2004, then-Commissioner-General of UNRWA Peter Hansen unapologetically admitted to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) that the UN employs members of Hamas. “Oh, I am sure that there are Hamas members on the UNRWA payroll,” Hansen stated, “and I don’t see that as a crime.”
By day, Awad al-Qiq was a respected science teacher and headmaster at a United Nations school in the Gaza Strip. By night, Palestinian militants say, he built rockets for Islamic Jihad.
Originally posted by budski
Blueraja - your sources regarding Israeli intel are from a different "mission" altogether.
End of story.
Unless you can provide evidence to back up your claims that Israel didn't target civilians, you are just posting opinion.
And they are like bottoms.
Unless you can provide evidence to back up your claims that Israel didn't target civilians, you are just posting opinion.
His group, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR), released a final tally Wednesday, saying 1,284 Gazans were killed......
.....The PCHR said 894 of the dead were civilians.....
Yet he acknowledged that troops "moved forward with fire" to prevent Israeli casualties and that "nobody had any illusions that civilians wouldn't be harmed as well."
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by ZeroKnowledge
Sorry, but that is not proof - that is a few numbers dressed up as logic to try and prove something and could come from anywhere.
The fact that there was severe collateral damage, and that WP was used even before troops were moved in, points to the deliberate targetting of civilians.
Sources as well please.
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by BlueRaja
For a week before the troops moved in?
Give me a break - this was a terror tactic, plain and simple.
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by BlueRaja
You and drooper seem to think you are the only ones here with military knowledge - patronising to say the least.
Gaza is not iraq
there are few places as heavily populated as gaza.
the israeli's used WP as a terror weapon long before troops went in.
this kind of use was useless against hamas and was intended to terrorise the civilian population by targetting them.
I'm done with the pair of you - neither of you can provide any substantive evidence, and would swear the sun rose in the north if that's what israel said.
Frankly, I'm bored of you - you have nothing to offer.