It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by Harlequin
hese have to be posted again:
click for full size
WP was used during the day , so that discounts the `illumination` arguement
was airburst for maximum field of effect and was dropped directly onto civilians.
the damning evidence above directly shows a war crime
This isn't white phosphorous seen it several times its an air burst gone wrong the munition is set to explode a set number of seconds after designation the howitzer that fired this miscalculated the trajectory angle and it went off way too low. if used correctly it would have shaken the ground like an earthquake. when they hit the ground the effect is lost and innocent people get hurt. And before you start i am not saying what Israel is doing is right but i am tired of people making things up to try to prove there view is correct. Theres 2 sides to every story.
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by BlueRaja
OK, so we have the UN, various humanitarian agencies and news reporters the world over saying this WP is being used on civilians - all of whihch has been posted in this thread.
Show some evidence to prove it ISN'T.
In other words, put up or shut up.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by hackbart
hack, I'll never argue that the Israelis have never done anything wrong, but if one wishes to talk about the rules, consider this:
Two opposing sides, about to fight. There are agreements that everyone accepts as rules of behavior in the fighting. There is an agreement. An understanding.
This agreement is much like a contract. Once one side breaks the rules of behavior, then there cannot possibly be an agreement, because that is now gone.
So it's open season. No rules. You start it by engaging in barbaric behavior, no problem. Now I'm free to do whatever I want. And if it's barbarism you prefer, I'll show you some real barbarism.
Now for God's sake, once you start coming up on the short end of the stick, don't whine to me about the damned rules you previously tossed. Don't whine. Don't cry to others.
I don't want to hear it.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by budski
Bud, you really, are . . . emotional. You haven't proved anything to me. Your idea of proof is opinion. I like absolute proof.
WP is legal, used for many purposes, it happens there were civilians in the area, but so what? That doesn't make it illegal.
Besides, Hamas dresses in civilian clothes, so how is one to really tell the difference? That alone could provide "reasonable doubt."
Israel has money, and so they get away with this? Is that your logic? Many Americans send Israelis money each year, and the US sends funding to Israel.
Kind of blows your argument, doesn't it?
In fact, all your arguments are bloated opinion, and thus, blow.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by breakingdradles
Do not try that stealing land crap back in 1967.
You know not what you're talking about.
Do some homework, son. It helps you keep from making completely false statements.
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by budski
The bursts so high above the ground almost are subject to opinion as to whether this really constitutes "use." Hell, it's almost all burned up it's so high up.
But the civilian targeting, the gas effect, all BS.
Gets hard to think in tights and after being on your tippy-toes, huh, Twinkletoes?
Originally posted by dooper
reply to post by breakingdradles
You are more confused than I thought.
You'll notice that no one went into Colombine for what seemed like hours. We all saw the impotence of the police.
Yours is an ongoing misconception. Folks wanting to apply civic virtues and behaviors to the arena of conflict and war.
Civic virtues are polar opposites of military virtues.
Police are not soldier. Soldiers are not police.
The civic hostage situation is generally one isolated incident at a time. Micro in nature.
A military conflict is generally widespread, and more macro.
The military has no need to read a combatant their rights.
The police are to use minimum force to facilitate an arrest, for trial.
The military are to use maximum force to inflict as much damage, death, and destruction as possible to end a conflict.
Big difference.