Really people, how on earth can you believe a man that claims he is the only one that can correctly translate ancient Sumerian tablets, with no formal
education in ancient history. If his translastions were correct, then that mean all the other
ligitimate, ancient biblical scholars in the
world are incorrect, or misread the same tablets. Now in my opinion, thats apretty enormous call.
So Sitchins claim to fame, is apparently that "gods" from another planet, Nibiru, came to Earth 450,000 years ago, and created humans through the
gentic engineering of female apes. He also claims the planet Nibiru, sits outside Pluto and orbits the sun every 3600 years. Because Nibiru sits so
far out from the sun, its only source of heat comes from within, by the decay of radioactive materials. He also claims that human descendants of these
"gods" killed themselves off 4000 years ago, with nuclear weapons, despite the fact that there is no evidence to sunstantiate this outrageous
theory.
Sitchin alone can look at a Sumerian tablet and see that it depicts a man being subjected to radiation. He alone knows how to correctly translate
ancient terms allowing him to discover such things as that the ancients made rockets (ibid., p. 46).* Yet, he doesn't seem to know that the seasons
are caused by the earth's tilt, not by its distance from the sun.
Thats pretty good for someone who is apparently an educated man.
According to a
real sumerian ancient text scholar,
"[Sitchin] demonstrates a consistent lack of appreciation of even some of the most basic fundamentals of Sumerian and Akkadian grammar, even to
the extent of regularly failing to distinguish between the two entirely different languages, and mixing words from each in interpreting the syllables
of longer compound words." This mixing of languages allows Sitchin to make amazing "discoveries."
Due to his arrogance, and claims of being the only one able to translate the tablets, he is shunned by other ancient scholars and stands alone with
his belief about Nibiru (apart from the conspiracy theory community, and his followers)
So despite all this information discrediting Sitchin, why do people still believe in it?
And whats this about Nibiru only being visible from the Southern pole. Anyone, that knows basic astronomy knows that if something is visible at the
southern most point of the globe, then it is visible from the entire southern hemisphere. Considering that none of the observatories and private
astronomers have found anything to idicate an enormous planet (or star in some cases) is hurtling towards us, then still why is this considered a
plausible theory? Also, some Nibiru'ers claim that it is hiding behind the sun, which is why we cant see it, again, this is impossible.
Another point to consider is the failed appearance of it in 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, and late 2008. If a prophecy fails to come true on more than one
occasion, why continue to believe it?
So I dont understand why people are getting all worked up about it, there's no evidence, people are taking the word of an economist (Sitchin was an
economist of all things), and worse of all negelecting all the evidence that points towards the Nibiru theory being unplausible.
www.sitchiniswrong.com...
jcolavito.tripod.com...
www.doomsdayguide.org...
Thoughts on this?
Just to add, the first link is from a real ancient text scholar, he has tax returns to prove it
admin edit: removed "not nice name" from title. No reason to sling names regardless of one's opinion of the person.
[edit on 1-21-2009 by Springer]