It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cluckerspud
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by cluckerspud
have the video?
i have been waiting for a high def vid to look at, i want to see the difference between the two, i know you-tube's compression is horrible, but the way it streaks through the air at the speed this (bird) was going was an incredible glitch that i want to understand.
im really interested on its speed. its speed was intense, but then again it could of been closer to the camera and could of been 40 mph.
any idea where i could grab a better version of the vid??
My suggestion is to write CNN.. other than that, I don't know.
I don't have it, but if I did and I uploaded it, I'm sure we'd be
back to square 1 (crappy compressed video).
I wish I was as clairvoyant as InfaRedMan when he said
to his girlfriend, "You watch, in a few hours someone will be claiming to have seen a UFO over the inauguration"!
It was a bird, nothing more.
Originally posted by ugie1028
Originally posted by cluckerspud
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by cluckerspud
have the video?
i have been waiting for a high def vid to look at, i want to see the difference between the two, i know you-tube's compression is horrible, but the way it streaks through the air at the speed this (bird) was going was an incredible glitch that i want to understand.
im really interested on its speed. its speed was intense, but then again it could of been closer to the camera and could of been 40 mph.
any idea where i could grab a better version of the vid??
My suggestion is to write CNN.. other than that, I don't know.
I don't have it, but if I did and I uploaded it, I'm sure we'd be
back to square 1 (crappy compressed video).
I wish I was as clairvoyant as InfaRedMan when he said
to his girlfriend, "You watch, in a few hours someone will be claiming to have seen a UFO over the inauguration"!
It was a bird, nothing more.
Alright mr chicken, since you are familiar with your species habits, ill take your word for it. but im still interested on fast that thing was going.
i think me and you are the only ones from jersey on ATS today.
KFC ANYONE!?
Originally posted by anathema777
Whatever it is it flies over a half mile in about 1 second. i mesured it out on google earth from the same angle as the video shoot with wolf blitzer in it that the OP provided
!Anathema
Originally posted by plainmike
Hey everyone. I've not viewed the footage, but I've got a question after reading some of the initial replies to this post...who's to say that THEY can't utilize a bird or even a bug-like decoy in their surveilance activities?
[edit on 21-1-2009 by plainmike]
Originally posted by cluckerspud
Making some points that rickyrrr made:
Originally posted by anathema777
Whatever it is it flies over a half mile in about 1 second. i mesured it out on google earth from the same angle as the video shoot with wolf blitzer in it that the OP provided
!Anathema
This video is NOT stereoscopic (3D).
So how can you know for certain that the numbers you plugged in your formula are even accurate?
Does Google earth show you where the camera was in relation to the BIRD?
NO!! You know the direction it was pointed.
Was the camera Zoomed in?! At what ratio?!
Not being able to answer these questions is solid proof, that you don't know
the physical location of the camera.
How high off the ground was the camera?!
Can you definitively say for certain what the flight of the BIRD was?
No, you can not on Google earth or with the video provided. We get a
general idea, but not an exact.
Your results are not true and therefore do not back up your statement of
an object flying half a mile a second.
IT'S A BIRD!!
Objectivethinking,
Hahaha, even if I said it was me, people would still be doing
there at home Google physics presentations.
[edit on 21-1-2009 by cluckerspud]
Originally posted by rickyrrr
Originally posted by Objectivethinking
I see what you mean.but what still is strange to me is the the bird covered more than 800 feet in about 1.5 seconds.this is evident from the vantage point of the cameraman and the relative size of the people walking below. however I have never been to washington so i would be familiar with the size of this particular area.
How can you know that? It's not like this video is stereoscopic (3D). So you don't know if the bird is very close to the camera or far away.
A bird close to the camera would look as big as this one and as fast.
A UFO further away from the camera would have to be much faster, but just so you know, sound travels at about 1 foot per milisecond. That means that a quarter mile takes about a second. The distance covered does not, at first glance, appear anywhere near a quarter mile.
-rrr
Originally posted by depthoffield
Originally posted by anathema777
Whatever it is it flies over a half mile in about 1 second. i mesured it out on google earth from the same angle as the video shoot with wolf blitzer in it that the OP provided
!Anathema
Are you sure? Half a mile? How do you know the distance to the "object"?
Then, in your (2D) "logic", maybe you can tell me the distance to this "UFO", who flies instantly above the mountains?
Those are insects or birds, meters or maybe tens of meters away. You confuse speed with angular speed.
For other "UFO's", see my personal holiday collection:
www.freewebs.com... (escamilla like rods too! in the bottom of the page)
Originally posted by plainmike
Hey everyone. I've not viewed the footage, but I've got a question after reading some of the initial replies to this post...who's to say that THEY can't utilize a bird or even a bug-like decoy in their surveilance activities?
[edit on 21-1-2009 by plainmike]
So, they deployed a bunch of bug-like decoys here in Romania, just to let me photograph them.
Now: is there in the OP some little tiny smaller bit of evidence that the moving pixel there is somethink extraordinary out of the common? Or we just like to talk words?